My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9568
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9568
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9568
Author
Resource Consultants Inc.
Title
Sediment Transport Studies of the Little Snake, Yampa, and Green River Systems.
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.5 Analysis of Historical Climate Records of the Upper <br />Green River / Yampa River Bal\iol\ <br /> <br />4.5.1 Introduction <br /> <br />The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether significant climate change has occurred from <br />1895 through 1989 in the Upper Green and Yampa River basins of the western United States (Balling and <br />Miller, 1990). The results of this analysis will support refmement of the geomorphic analysis of the <br />Yampa/Little Snake/Green River system. Three monthly climatic variables -- mean temperature, total <br />precipitation, and the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) -- were examined for six climate divisions <br />in Utah, Colorado, and Wyoming (F'JgU1"e 4.7). A variety of statistical techniques were used to ascertain <br />whether (a) there have been any significant trends over the 95-year record, and (b) whether there have been <br />any significant climatic changes since the closing of Flaming Gorge Dam in 1962. <br /> <br />4.5.2 Study Area and Climatic Data Bases <br /> <br />The study area (Figure 4.7) comprises the drainage basins of the Upper Green River, the Little <br />Snake River, and the Yampa River. Six climatic divisions lie within the boundaries of the study area. <br />These divisions are defined by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), and are used to aggregate <br />climatic data to larger areal units. Three divisions are in Utah (North Mountains, Uinta Basin, Southeast), <br />one in Colorado (Colorado Drainage), and two are in Wyoming (Green and Bear Drainage, Upper Platte). <br />Divisional mean temperature and total precipitation are calculated for each month by NCDC. From these <br />values, several drought indices are computed -- among these the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index. <br /> <br />The PHDI is based on the balance between the natural water supply and the natural water <br />demand. Many semi-empirical equations are used to convert routinely-measured temperatures into <br />estimates of potential evapotranspiration. These estimates are compared to precipitation levels, and the <br />results are integrated into a set of soil parameters that may vary through space; a soil moisture <br />"bookkeeping" scheme is essentially developed using the procedure. Palmer "normalized" the index to allow <br />drought or wetness severities to be directly compared from area to area. Values near 0 indicate near <br />normal conditions, values below -4 indicate "extremely dry" conditions, while values of +4 or above are <br />indicative of "extremely wet" conditions. <br /> <br />Most researchers use the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) to represent meteorological <br />drought or wetness conditions. In this investigation, the Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) is <br />chosen to better represent the impact of climate on a hydrological system. Karl and Knight, in their Atlas of <br />Monthly Palmer Hydrological Drought Indices (1895-1930) for the Contiguous United States (NCDC <br />Historical Climatology Series 3-6,1985, page ix), stated: <br /> <br />"The PDSI is a meteorological drought index and it attempts to classify spells of <br />weather. This means that once the weather begins to return to a new regime, <br />regardless of soil moisture conditions, streamflow, or lake levels, etc., the index will <br />rapidly respond and return to near normal values. The PHDls should more closely <br />reflect water availability (i.e. soil moisture, streamflow, and lake levels) when a <br />drought or wet spell is ending than the traditional PDSI . . ." <br /> <br />The computational details, the sensitivities, and the limitations of the PDSI and the PHDI are available in <br />a number of sources; the PHDI appears to be the superior choice in this study given the focus on changes <br />in a hydrological system. <br /> <br />4-8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.