Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 2.1 Water and sediment yield, Little Snake and <br />Yampa Rivers (after Andrews, 1978). <br /> <br /> Area Mean Annual Mean Annual Sediment Load (tons) <br /> Discharge <br /> (sa mi) (cfs) Sus>>ended Bedload Total <br />Little Snake R. 3,730 575 1,300,000 70,000 1,400,000 <br />at Lily <br />Yampa R. at 3,410 1,550 420,000 120,000 540,000 <br />Maybell <br /> <br />Andrews (1980) evaluated effective and bankfull discharges at 15 locations in the Yampa River <br />basin. The effective discharge was defmed as the increment of discharge that transports the largest fraction <br />of the annual load over a period of years, while the bankfull discharge was defined as the discharge that <br />filled the channel to the level of the floodplain. Effective discharges were found to range from the 1.18 to <br />3.26 year retwn period, and were equaled or exceeded from 1.5 to 11 days per year. The bankfull discharge <br />was found to nearly equal the effective discharge, suggesting that the stream channels were adjusted to <br />their effective discharge. For the Little Snake River at Lily the effective discharge was 4485 ds and the <br />bankfull discharge, 4697 cfs. Similarly, for the Yampa River at Maybell the values were 9111 ds and 9005, <br />respectively. <br /> <br />O'Brien (1984) completed detailed field sampling of water and sediment discharge in the Yampa <br />River Canyon at Mathers Hole during 1982 and 1983. Standard USGS sampling techniques were used and <br />the data base is considered quite valuable and useful. Analytical studies were also completed which <br />suggested a minimum streamflow hydrograph; however, these analyses were not utilized nor adopted in <br />this report (Resource Consultants, Inc., Yampa River Task 1 Report, 1989). <br /> <br />23 Green River Literature Review <br /> <br />Andrews (1986) evaluated the effects of Flaming Gorge Reservoir on the Green River. Prior to <br />construction of Flaming Gorge Dam and Reservoir, the drainage area upstream of the damsite supplied 27 <br />percent of the total basin discharge, but only 2.2 percent of the mean annual sediment loading. The <br />conclusion was that the large water-contributing portions of the basin lie around the rim, particularly the <br />northeast divide, while the sediment contributing areas are located in the central and southern parts of the <br />basin. After completion of the reservoir, Andrews concluded that the reach downstream to the Yampa <br />River (68 river miles) was degradational, but limited somewhat by armoring. From the Yampa to the <br />Duchesne River the channel was in equilibrium, and downstream of the Duchesne the channel was <br />aggradational. Andrews concluded that the greatest impact of Flaming Gorge is not immediately <br />downstream, but instead several hundred miles downstream. He also found that the magnitude of the <br />effective discharge had decreased significantly in all reaches and that channel width had narrowed, <br />however, he concluded that a new equilibrium had not been achieved and significantly more narrowing <br />could occur. <br /> <br />Andrews and Nelson (1988) found that the most significant process narrowing the channel was <br />aggradation of channel bars resulting in attachment to the bank and incorporation into the floodplain. <br />Based on detailed photo interpretation by Pucherelli et aI. (1988), Lyons (1989) generally concurred with <br />this assessment, indicating 40 percent of the observed channel narrowing was attributed to island <br />attachment. <br /> <br />2-2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />