Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1.4 StuctY Reacb Delineation <br /> <br />Considering tbe entire life cycle, tbe above discussion indicates tbat tbe Yampa River from tbe <br />mouth upstream to Craig, Colorado, the lower 10 miles of the Little Snake and much of the upper Green <br />River below Flaming Gorge are habitat areas for endangered Colorado River fish. However, for purposes <br />of tbis investigation, detailed analyses of morpbological conditions were limited to tbe spawning babitat <br />areas in Yampa Canyon (as related to tbe need to maintain clean cobble surfaces) and Green River <br />backwater habitat (as related to the need to maintain sballow, protected backwater areas). Consideration <br />of greater reacb lengtbs was completed only to tbe extent necessary given tbe dynamic nature of fluvial <br />system response and the potentially long distances over which such responses occur. <br /> <br />1.5 Rc;port Status <br /> <br />This study was jointly sponsored by tbe Colorado River Water Conservation District (River <br />District) and the Wyoming Water Development Commission (WOe), and was conducted in cooperation <br />with tbe U. S. FISh and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Water Resources Section, Denver, Colorado. The River <br />District effort was conducted in relation to a study permit on tbe Yampa River authorized by the Federal <br />Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Tbe WOC effort is related to Wyoming's participation in tbe <br />Recovery Implementation Program. A May, 1990 Interim Report summarized the results of the first two <br />phases (Tasks 1 through 10) which included detailed studies of tbe Little Snake and Yampa River systems, <br />and preliminary investigations of tbe Green River. Tbese first two pbases included data gatbering, <br />reconnaissance, and baseline bydrologic, bydraulic, and sediment transport analyses. This report updates <br />the May 1990 Interim Report and provides results, of Pbase 3 of the study which includes refinement of the <br />evaluation of sediment transport processes and geomorphic response and an analysis of climatic trends in <br />the Upper Green and Yampa River basins. A subsequent phase of tbe study may involve additional field <br />work and consideration of tbe effects of various project operational scenarios. <br /> <br />Much of tbe bydrologic data and analysis of Cbapter4.0 were contributed by Mr. Mark Butler, <br />USFWS Water Resources Section, Denver, Colorado. The long-term climate analyses of Chapter 4.0 were <br />provided by Dr. Robert C. Balling, Jr. and Mr. Tomas A. Miller of the Laboratory of Climatology, Arizona <br />State University, Tempe, Arizona and tbe geomorphic analysis of canyon-bound streams was completed by <br />Dr. Mike Harvey, Water Engineering and Technology, Fort Collins, Colorado. <br /> <br />1-4 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />