Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Fmal Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-lOiO. Amendment 3 <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />redistribution of sediment and the large-scale response of the channel features to flood passage. <br /> <br />Three geomorphic settings create the majority of nursery habitat lli the 10-km study reach. These settings are <br /> <br />(1) the downstream end of secondary channels. (2) the upstream end of secondary channels. and (3) inactive chute <br /> <br />channels. The first and third of these settings are also the most common location of deep nursery habitats. Overall. a <br /> <br />small number of sites provide the majority of the total area of deep habitats in any year. <br /> <br />The number and size of these habitats changed from year to year in this study. The hig!1 magnitude flood of <br /> <br />1993 did not significantly increase the number or total area of deep nursery habitats. but the total number and area of all <br /> <br />habitats greatly decreased. In contrast, the number and area of deep habitats and total habitats decreased after passage of <br /> <br />the relatively small flood of 1994. The 1994 flood created more habitats than did the 1992 flood. <br /> <br />Analysis of the geomorphic settings of nursery habitats at the detailed study site show that different settings <br /> <br />create available habitat at different discharges (Fig. ES 1). Thus, the shape of discharge-dependent habitat availability <br /> <br />curves (HAC's) in any year is determined by the topographic relief and relative size of the geomorphic features that <br /> <br /> WATER SURFACE ElEV AllON. IN METERS <br /> 93.5 94.0 94.5 95.0 9 .5 <br /> 14000 <br />en <br />;12~ X <br />SECONDARY <br />CHANNEL ~~\ <br />~1(XX)Q <br />:J ISOLAlED <br />0 <br />en 8000 POOL <br />~ <br />~ V BAR rop <br />-< 6000 <br />~ <br />~ 4000 <br />>- I~\ ~-.. <br />Ii] <br />en 2000 I II ,..~, <br />~ I I I />1' <br />z <br /> 0 <br /> 0 50 100 ISO 200 250 300 3SO <br /> DISCHARGE. IN CUBIC METERS PER SECOND <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE ES 1. Decomposition of the localized habitat availability curve by geomorphic classification. Area of <br />available habitat is separated into geomorphic components (for example, the habitats associated with the secondary <br />channel, superimposed bars. and isolated pools). Dashed and solid lines indicate 1993 and 1994 habitats, respectively. <br />. The total available habitat in 1993 and 1994 are indicated by X's and +'s, respectively. The lines do not always <br />coincide with the markers but the addition of the curves for available habitat in each geomorphic setting for each year <br />results in habitat availability curve shown in Figure 31. <br />