My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8251
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8251
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:39:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8251
Author
Rakowski, C. L. and J. C. Schmidt.
Title
The Geomorphic Basis of Colorado Squawfish Nursery Habitat in the Green River Near Ouray, Utah.
USFW Year
1996.
USFW - Doc Type
#93-1070,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />determining the physical processes that produce bar forms of different morphology. <br /> <br />While geomorphic research continues on river bedforms (for example, Rajagura and others, 1995; Bridge and <br /> <br />Gabel, 1992; Gabel, 1993; Brierley, 1991; Rubin and others, 1990; Crowley, 1983), the debate on the classification and <br /> <br /> <br />naming of those features also continues. Many researchers consider the bedforms between ripples and upper plane bed <br /> <br />as a continuum of what should be called "dunes" (Ashley, 1990). These "dunes" have spacing of less than 1 m to <br /> <br /> <br />greater than 1000 m. However, the terminology commonly understood by ecologists and geomorphologists is defined in <br /> <br />the following paragraphs and used to describe the geomorphic features of the study area. <br /> <br />In sand-bedded rivers, many large-scale geomorphic sediment features form at higher "channel-forming" flows <br /> <br />and are exposed by the subsequent lower flows (Crowley, 1983). Many forms of these within-channel features (i.e., <br /> <br />bars) exist (Brierley, 1991). Bars have lengths of the same order as the channel width, and heights of the same order as <br /> <br /> <br />mean depth of the generating flow (yalin. 1992). Alternate bars form in both straight and meandering channels, and <br /> <br /> <br />occur periodically along alternating banks as the thalweg meanders between bars at low flows (Leopold and others, <br /> <br /> <br />1964). Alternate bars may migrate in the downstream direction or they may be fixed in their location. Point bars occur <br /> <br />on the inside of meander bends, and are in part, a product of helical flow in the bend (Leopold and others, 1964; Ikeda, <br /> <br /> <br />1989). Mid-channel bars, typically found in braided rivers but also in some meandering rivers, are roughly riillmond <br /> <br />shaped, and align with and split the flow (Leopold ~ others, 1964). While mid-channel bars are transient in nature, <br /> <br /> <br />point bars are stationary features. <br /> <br />In this research. the terminology of Brierley (1991) is adapted to describe some distinguishing characteristics <br /> <br />of these bars (Fig. 8). Chu te channels are any short -circuiting channel across a bar. A secondary channel is a chute <br /> <br /> <br />channel that occurs on the shoreward side of a bank-attached alternate bar. Bank-attached bars occur along the margins <br /> <br /> <br />of the channel although at some discharges these bars may be separated from the bank by secondary channels. Bank- <br /> <br />attached bars with laterally dissecting chute channels are referred to as bank-attached compound bars, even if the chute <br /> <br /> <br />channels are inactive at some discharges. Point bar are associated with meander bends. <br /> <br />Bars within a channel migrate downstream or are stationary in location. Within the Ouray NWR, the location <br /> <br />of bars has been relatively constant over the last 30 years (Andrews and Nelson. 1989). Ikeda (1989) described two <br /> <br /> <br />types of stationary bars observed for rivers with restricted meanders: fixed and forced. Ikeda used flume study results <br /> <br /> <br />to explain the processes that produce each bar type. Migrating alternate bars become fixed when the deflection angle of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.