Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft Final Completion Report to UDWR for Contract #93-1070, Amendment 3 <br /> <br />Xl <br /> <br />~ODS .................................................................................... 22 <br /> <br />FieldMeasurements ...................................................................... 22 <br /> <br />Detailed topographic swveys ....................................................... 22 <br /> <br />Cross Section Swveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 <br /> <br />Cross-Section Analysis ............................................................ 23 <br /> <br />Other Swveys ................................................................... 24 <br /> <br />Use of Detailed Topography to Develop a <br />Localized Habitat Availability Cwve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 <br /> <br />Analysis of Video Prints . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 <br /> <br />Basemaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25 <br /> <br />Interpretation and Transfer ..................... .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 <br /> <br />Enumeration of Bars .............................................................. 27 <br /> <br />GIS Statistics " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 <br />UDWR Nursery Habitat Swveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 <br />Integration ofUDWR Nursery Habitat Sampling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 <br />Flow and Sediment Transpon Modeling ...................................................... 30 <br />Details of Andrews and Nelson (1989) Flow and <br />SedUnent Model FonnWation ................................................30 <br /> <br />Model Modifications .............................................................. 31 <br /> <br />Linkages Between Scales ................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 <br />Validation of Video Work... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. ... . . ... . ... ... .... . 32 <br /> <br />Representativeness of 1.5-km Reach . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 <br /> <br />RESULTS ..................................................................................... 34 <br /> <br />Geomorphology ......................................................................... 34 <br /> <br />Geomorphic Characteristics and Changes of the <br />Bank-attached Compound Bar in the Upstream <br />Part of the 1.5-km Reach ..........................,........................ 34 <br /> <br />1992 ................................................................... 35 <br /> <br />1993 - Channel cross-section measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 35 <br />1993 Emergent bar fonn ................................................... 36 <br />1994 . Channel cross-section measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 <br /> <br />1994 . Emergent bar fonn .................................................. 37 <br /> <br />Geomorphic Characteristics and Changes in <br /> <br />the l.5-km Study Reach .................................................... 38 <br />SedUnent budget within the 1.5-km reach ...................................... 39 <br />Geomorphic Characteristics and Changes in the <br /> <br />10-km Study Reach ....................................................... 40 <br />Flow and Sediment Transport Model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 <br />SimWated Topography and Sediment Transport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 <br /> <br />Flood SimWations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 <br /> <br />Comparison to Field Work ......................................................... 44 <br />Comparability of Topographic and Video-Imagery Data ..............;.......................... 45 <br /> <br />Nursery Habitat Availability and Its Changes with Time. . . . .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . 46 <br />Use of Topographic Maps to Evaluate Discharge- <br />Dependent Changes in Available Habitat ...................................... 46 <br />Habitat Availability in the 1.5-km and lO-km <br />Reaches as Determined from Video Images .................................... 48 <br />Validation ofremotely sensed data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 <br />Changes in the Geomorphic Setting of <br /> <br />Nursery Habitats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 <br />