My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8205
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8205
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:36:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8205
Author
Quartarone, F.
Title
Historical Accounts of Upper Colorado River Basin Endangered Fish.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Arthur Daugherty (Clifton, Colo.) remembered catching "a few razorback <br />suckers," which his father firmly disliked. <br />"Oh yeah, there was humpback suckers, camel back suckers that they're <br />protecting now. We didn't especially like them," he said. "My guess is they're <br />too hard to skin. Dad always like to skin things. Sometimes we'd just throw <br />them back because we figured to get the skin off of them over the hump was a <br />real problem." <br />Arel Hunt (Green River, Utah) talked about eating razorback suckers for <br />subsistence. <br />"We used to catch humpback suckers. Right behind their eyes they had a <br />hump on 'em," he said. "We were too damn poor; we had to eat them. They're <br />good flavored if you could get rid of the bones. There was eight of us at home. <br />We kept everything." <br /> <br />Bony tails, humpbacks and razorbacks as table fare <br />Despite complaints about the bones, some residents preferred eating bony- <br />tail chubs, humpback chubs and razorback suckers. <br />Essie White (Moab, Utah) recalled townspeople canning fish caught out of <br />the Colorado River: "Yeah, they used to can it. They used to put those bonetails <br />and everything like that in the cans and pressure them and usually couldn't even <br />tell there was bones at all; you'd eat all of them. They were just soft. They <br />didn't bother you. A lot of people canned fish." <br />Ray Case (Debeque, Colo.) believed the razorback or humpback sucker <br />was some of the finest eating fish available, Case caught his razorback suckers <br />just above Palisade, Colo. <br />"Back then, we'd talk about people, the old timers we knew around, of <br />course all the old timers that were here that fished that river are all dead now. <br />And everybody called them the humpback suckers. They might have had a <br />humpback, but that hump was pretty good eating. We were so cotton-picking <br />poor that we didn't know good from bad. <br />"Somebody told us something about <br />liking suckers. They have a good flavor, a <br />flavor of their own. Just split them, kind of <br />slice them up, they're really bony but you <br />split them and deep fry them and fry them <br />pretty crisp and those bones didn't seem to <br />bother you. <br />"I still say they're the best fish there <br />is to eat; that's the truth. I'd rather have <br />them. We had to be awful careful with the <br />kids because of the bones." <br />Tom Hastings (Green River, Utah) <br />recalled a trapper who had a penchant for <br />razorback suckers. <br />"There was an old trapper here, well <br />he was here after I come back from World <br />War II," Hastings said. "He'd catch those <br />suckers and eat them. I don't know how <br />they fixed them, but they thought they <br /> <br /> <br />Photo courtesy of Tom Hastings <br />Green River, Utah trapper <br />Mac McDowell thought <br />razorback suckers were <br />'better than catfish.' <br /> <br />Uses of <br />endangered <br />fish <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.