My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8273
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:34:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8273
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Title
Guidelines for Interpretation of the Biological Effects of Selected Constituents in Biota, Water, and Sediment.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />National Irrigation Water Quality Program Guidelines <br /> <br />Biotic Effects <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />large-mouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) from <br />Pinfeather Lake had deformed fins, jaws, <br />heads, and eyes; waterborne arsenic concen- <br />trations at the time were 0.54 mg/L. <br /> <br />Abiotic Factors Affecting <br />Bioavailability <br /> <br />Water <br /> <br />Many factors influence arsenic toxicity in <br />water, including water temperature, pH, <br />organic content, phosphate concentration, <br />suspended soils, the presence of other <br />substances and oxidants, and arsenic <br />speciation. A study by McGeachy and Dixon <br />(1990) confirmed that more arsenic is taken up <br />as the water temperature increases. <br /> <br />Sediment <br /> <br />Higher levels of arsenic in sediment were <br />correlated with levels in macrophytes in a <br />study done by Tanner and Clayton (1990), but <br />other studies (Cain et al. 1992, Smith et al. <br />1992) reported low bioavailability and little <br />partitioning of arsenic from contaminated <br />sediments. Long and Morgan (1990) and <br />Long et al. (1995) made a comprehensive <br />evaluation of chemical concentrations in <br />sediments that were associated with adverse <br />biological effects. They concluded that arsenic <br />concentrations of 8.2 mg/kg dw or less do not <br />usually produce adverse effects, but concen- <br />trations of 70 mg/kg or higher usually do. <br />Although many of the data evaluated were for <br />estuarine and marine sediments, Hull and <br />Suter (1994) concluded that those screening <br />levels also were appropriate for freshwater <br />sediments until more specific guidelines <br />become available. However, it is also <br />recommended that these concentrations be <br />compared to local background levels when <br />possible. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />Tables 2, 3, and 4 at the end of this chapter list <br />the reported biotic effects of arsenic in water, <br />sediment, and diet, respectively. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Plants <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Arsenic is not an essential element in plants <br />(Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 1992), although <br />small increases in yield have been observed <br />for several species at low levels of soil arsenic <br />(Woolson 1975). Some forms of arsenic, such <br />as sodium arsenate and arsenic trioxide, are <br />extremely toxic to plants. Arsenic uptake <br />seems to be passive (Bodek et al. 1988) from <br />terrestrial soil to plants. The major symptoms <br />of arsenic toxicity in plants are red-brown <br />necrotic spots on old leaves, yellowing or <br />browning of the roots, wilting of new leaves, <br />and depressed tillering (Kabata-Pendias and <br />Pendias 1992). Sensitive species such as <br />spinach (Spinacia oleracea) showed 40-percent <br />reduction in growth when exposed to As (V) <br />at 10 mg/kg in soil (table 3). Low concen- <br />trations of As (V) in water (1-15.2 pg/L) have <br />been reported to inhibit certain aquatic plants, <br />resulting in noticeable changes throughout the <br />ecosystem. Sanders and Cibik (1985) have <br />reported consequen~ changes in the composi- <br />tion and succession of species and in predator- <br />prey relations in chronic studies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Amphibians/Reptiles <br /> <br />Very few studies have investigated the effects <br />of arsenic on amphibians and reptiles. <br />Khangarot et al. (1985) determined the acute <br />toxicity of As (m) to tadpoles (Rana <br />hexadactyla). Under the conditions of pH 6.1, <br />temperature 15 oC, and total hardness <br />20 mg/L (calcium carbonate), they found <br />that a concentration of 249 pg As/L <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.