Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT NO.4 <br />DEVELOPMENT OF CHANNEL-GEOMETRY INFORMATION <br />FOR FLOW AND SEDIMENT-TRANSPORT MODELS <br />Julia B. Graf, Samuel M.D. Jansen, <br />J. Dungan Smith, and Stephen M. Wiele <br />U.S. Geological Survey <br />375 South Euclid Avenue <br />Tucson AZ, 85719-6644 <br />Introduction <br />As a part of the GCES (Glen Canyon Environmental Studies), the USGS (U.S. Geological <br />Survey) began in 1991 to develop a suite of flow, sediment-transport, and bed-evolution models <br />for prediction of sand accumulation or loss in various reaches of the Colorado River and for <br />determination of the response of sand deposits to discharges in the river produced by dam <br />releases. Accurate characterization of channel geometry up to the highest elevation affected by <br />all proposed or possible flows is required for these single and multidimensional models. <br />Topographic information from published USGS topographic maps is not precise enough for use <br />in the flow and sediment transport models under development and does not give channel <br />morphology below the water surface. <br />The USGS began collecting bathymetric data for the river reaches in Reclamation's (Bureau of <br />Reclamation) GIS data base in 1991 to supplement the topographic information in that archive <br />that was developed photogrammetrically with bathymetry and to define the bed morphology for <br />model development. <br />Reach 5 of the GCESIGIS set, extending from river mile 60 to river mile 72, was selected as the <br />reach in which to begin model development because the Little Colorado River, which joins the <br />Colorado River at river mile 61, is the largest source of sand for the Colorado River in Grand <br />Canyon National Park, and because the reach downstream from the Little Colorado River mouth <br />is important to native fish. Maps showing the combined Reclamation topographic and USGS <br />bathymetric data are being prepared for the reach from just below the Little Colorado River <br />confluence to just above Tanner Canyon Rapid at river mile 68.5-a 10.3-km segment of the <br />19-km4ong GCES/GIS reach. The maps (fig. 14) will show topography with a contour interval <br />of 1 m, except where near-vertical slopes make contours at that interval unreadable. <br />Methodology <br />Bathymetric data were collected with two generations of manual-tracking, range-azimuth <br />positioning systems. Both systems consist of an electronic theodolite to establish the ties to the <br />control network and a modified laser EDM (electronic distance meter)-mounted above the <br />theodolite-to track a boat-mounted target. Depth was measured with a sonic depth sounder, <br />then digital position and depth data were sent directly or via radio modems to a datalogger or <br />laptop computer. Depth also was recorded on paper charts. <br />Position information is lost or incorrect information is recorded when an instrument operator <br />fails to track the boat within a preset tolerance, when the operator loses sight of the boat as it <br />passes behind a rock outcrop, or when the laser reflects off an object other than the target, such <br />as a tree or a cliff face beyond the boat. Also, interference can occasionally cause the radio <br />29