My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8211
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8211
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:27:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8211
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Fish and Wildlife Service.
Title
Final Environmental Assessment
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Providing Fish Passage at the Grand Valley Irrigation Company diversion Dam on the Colorado River.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Recovery Program participants realize, that if providing fish passage at the GVIC Diversion <br />is successful, two additional fish passageways would be considered upstream: one at the Price- <br />Stubb Dam and another at the Government Highline Diversion Dam. This EA is not intended to <br />serve as full NEPA compliance for these passageways because effective design concepts have not <br />been developed and it is uncertain whether those passageways would be constructed. It is <br />recognized, however, that should the additional structures be built, they would function in a <br />manner similar to the GVIC structure and, in the case of the Government Highline Diversion, <br />have similar operational concerns. The Price-Stubb Dam, while still blocking the river, has not <br />been used for irrigation diversions for almost 80 years. Certain environmental commitments are <br />included in this EA that would protect environmental resources and water uses, and, if the <br />upstream passageways are constructed in the future, would be applicable to those sites. <br />Additional NEPA compliance would be completed, as necessary, for the other two structures. <br />From a cumulative impact standpoint, if all three structures were constructed and worked <br />successfully, chances for recovering the fish between Palisade and Rifle would greatly improve. <br />If it is not possible to provide fish passage at the GVIC Diversion Dam, then there may be no <br />justification for further upstream passageways.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.