Laserfiche WebLink
Description of Alternatives <br />Although an occasional floodflow (greater than 33,200 cfs) may rebuild <br />high elevation beaches and re-form backwaters, frequent floodflows <br />would likely transport more sand than could be supplied by the <br />tributaries-resulting in long-term sandbar erosion. Therefore, habitat <br />maintenance flows are included in this alternative to re-form backwaters, <br />which are important for fish habitat. <br />Habitat maintenance flows are high, steady releases within powerplant <br />capacity for 1 to 2 weeks in the spring. The exact month would be <br />determined under the Adaptive Management Program and the Annual <br />Operating Plan. March was assumed for evaluating impacts for the <br />following reasons: <br />Backwater channels could be re-formed prior to the humpback chub <br />spawning period. <br />More sediment is likely to be supplied by tributary flow in March than <br />later in the spring. <br />• March is prior to the peak recreation use season. <br />Habitat maintenance flows would not be scheduled when the projected <br />storage in Lake Powell on January 1 is greater than 19 maf. Annual release <br />volumes under such conditions are typically greater than the minimum <br />annual release volume (8.23 maf), and such flows already may be near or <br />exceed powerplant capacity. <br />Although habitat maintenance flows are defined as steady, minor fluctu- <br />ations of up to plus or minus 1,000 cfs would be permitted to regulate <br />voltage within the power grid. Maintenance flows would begin by <br />increasing flows at a rate no greater than 4,000 cfs/hour and would <br />conclude by decreasing flows back to the normal operating range at a rate <br />no greater than 1,500 cfs/hour. The limit on daily change in flow would <br />not apply during these transitions. <br />Habitat maintenance flows differ from beach/habitat-building flows <br />because they would be within powerplant capacity and would occur <br />nearly every year when the reservoir is low. Habitat maintenance flows <br />would not occur in years when a beach/habitat-building flow is <br />scheduled. Neither of these special releases would be scheduled in a year <br />when there is corcem for a sensitive resource-such as sediment or an <br />endangered species. <br />Increasing the flow to 30,000 cfs for 10 days would result in the release of <br />an additional 412,000 acre-feet of water in March, which would require <br />adjusting the release volumes in the other months. This scheduling <br />adjustment would be determined during the Annual Operating Plan <br />preparation and may vary from year to year. <br />26 Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary