My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8128
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8128
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Glen Canyon Dam\
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Description of Alternatives <br />Although an occasional floodflow (greater than 33,200 cfs) may rebuild <br />high elevation beaches and re-form backwaters, frequent floodflows <br />would likely transport more sand than could be supplied by the <br />tributaries-resulting in long-term sandbar erosion. Therefore, habitat <br />maintenance flows are included in this alternative to re-form backwaters, <br />which are important for fish habitat. <br />Habitat maintenance flows are high, steady releases within powerplant <br />capacity for 1 to 2 weeks in the spring. The exact month would be <br />determined under the Adaptive Management Program and the Annual <br />Operating Plan. March was assumed for evaluating impacts for the <br />following reasons: <br />Backwater channels could be re-formed prior to the humpback chub <br />spawning period. <br />More sediment is likely to be supplied by tributary flow in March than <br />later in the spring. <br />• March is prior to the peak recreation use season. <br />Habitat maintenance flows would not be scheduled when the projected <br />storage in Lake Powell on January 1 is greater than 19 maf. Annual release <br />volumes under such conditions are typically greater than the minimum <br />annual release volume (8.23 maf), and such flows already may be near or <br />exceed powerplant capacity. <br />Although habitat maintenance flows are defined as steady, minor fluctu- <br />ations of up to plus or minus 1,000 cfs would be permitted to regulate <br />voltage within the power grid. Maintenance flows would begin by <br />increasing flows at a rate no greater than 4,000 cfs/hour and would <br />conclude by decreasing flows back to the normal operating range at a rate <br />no greater than 1,500 cfs/hour. The limit on daily change in flow would <br />not apply during these transitions. <br />Habitat maintenance flows differ from beach/habitat-building flows <br />because they would be within powerplant capacity and would occur <br />nearly every year when the reservoir is low. Habitat maintenance flows <br />would not occur in years when a beach/habitat-building flow is <br />scheduled. Neither of these special releases would be scheduled in a year <br />when there is corcem for a sensitive resource-such as sediment or an <br />endangered species. <br />Increasing the flow to 30,000 cfs for 10 days would result in the release of <br />an additional 412,000 acre-feet of water in March, which would require <br />adjusting the release volumes in the other months. This scheduling <br />adjustment would be determined during the Annual Operating Plan <br />preparation and may vary from year to year. <br />26 Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.