My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8128
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:27:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8128
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Glen Canyon Dam\
USFW Year
1995.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Description of Alternatives <br />and is the warmest possible temperature (not necessarily the optimum <br />temperature) for native fish or other resources. Withdrawal levels could be <br />seasonally adjusted to meet ecological objectives, although this would <br />involve complex factors. <br />Releasing warmer water during the spring and summer months could <br />possibly raise river temperatures in some downstream reaches to a level <br />that would support spawning by humpback chub and other native fish. <br />However, increasing the temperature of river water may also create <br />problems for species currently inhabiting the Colorado River below Glen <br />Canyon Dam. The cold river temperatures may act as a barrier to the <br />establishment of non-native predatory fish from Lake Mead. Higher water <br />temperatures may encourage the upstream migration and establishment of <br />predatory fish, further endangering humpback chub and other native fish <br />through increased predation or competition from non-native migrants and <br />resident non-native fish. <br />The cost of installing multilevel intake structures at Glen Canyon Dam has <br />been estimated at $60 million. This estimate is based on actual costs for <br />similar structures at Flaming Gorge Dam. <br />Reclamation would implement a selective withdrawal program and <br />determine feasibility by aggressively pursuing and supporting research on <br />the effects of multilevel intake structures at Glen Canyon Dam and would <br />use the research results to make a firm decision on construction. FWS, in <br />consultation with AGFD, would be responsible for recommending to <br />Reclamation whether or not selective withdrawal should be implemented <br />at Glen Canyon Dam. Reclamation would be responsible for design, <br />NEPA compliance, permits, construction, operation, and maintenance. <br />Emergency Exception Criteria <br />Normal operations described under any alternative would be altered <br />temporarily to respond to emergencies. These changes in operations <br />would be of short duration (usually less than 4 hours) and would be the <br />result of emergencies at the dam, downstream, or within the intercon- <br />nected electrical system. Examples of system emergencies include: <br />• Insufficient generating capacity <br />• Transmission system: overload, voltage control, and frequency <br />• System restoration <br />• Humanitarian situations (search and rescue) <br />16 Glen Canyon Dam EIS Summary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.