My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9631
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9631
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9631
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Draft Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
there would be some years classified as moderately wet when the conditions of these <br />factors in table S-4 would be such that targets established for the wet or average <br />classification would be met. There could also be years classified as wet where <br />moderately wet targets would be achieved because of the conditions of these factors. It <br />would be the responsibility of Reclamation to ensure that, over the long term, Flaming <br />Gorge Dam and Powerplant are operated consistent with the 2000 Flow and Temperature <br />Recommendations. <br />The operations plan would describe the current hydrologic classification of the Green <br />River Basin and the hydrologic conditions in the Yampa River Basin, including the most <br />probable runoff patterns for the two basins. The operations plan would also identify the <br />likely Reach 2 flow magnitudes and durations that would be targeted for the upcoming <br />spring release. Because hydrologic conditions often change during the April through July <br />runoff period, the operations plan would contain a range of operating strategies that could <br />be implemented. Flow and duration targets for these alternate operating strategies would <br />be limited to those described for one classification lower or two classifications higher <br />than the classification for the current year. <br />The spring operations plan would be presented to the Flaming Gorge Working Group <br />each spring for discussion. Reclamation could modify the plan based on information <br />gathered at the Flaming Gorge Working Group meeting. <br />In years classified as wet, bypass releases would usually be required both to operate the <br />dam safely and to meet the 2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations. Releases <br />above powerplant capacity would be expected to be made for a period of about 4 to <br />9 weeks. The exact magnitude of the release and duration of the release would depend <br />upon factors identified in table S-4. Wet years, high releases would be expected to occur <br />from mid-May to early July (and, in very wet years, through July). The bypass and <br />spillway releases, required in wet years, would be timed with the objective of meeting <br />Reach 2 wet or moderately wet year targets, depending upon the hydrologic conditions in <br />the Yampa River. The initiation of bypass and spillway releases would take place in mid- <br />to late May coincident with the Yampa River peak. In extremely wet years, releases <br />above powerplant capacity could be initiated in April or early May before the Yampa <br />River peak. <br />In years classified as moderately wet, bypass releases usually (but not always) would be <br />required for safe operation of the dam and to meet the 2000 Flow and Temperature <br />Recommendations. Occasionally, some use of the spillway also might be required in <br />moderately wet years for safe operation of the dam. The volume of the powerplant <br />bypass in moderately wet years would be less than in wet years and would generally <br />occur for a period of about 1 to 7 weeks. The timing of these releases would be from <br />mid- to late May into June and sometimes extend into July. Releases from Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir in moderately wet years would be timed with the objective of meeting <br />Reach 2 wet, moderately wet, or average year targets, depending upon the hydrologic <br />conditions in the Yampa River basin and the information contained in table S-4. <br />In years classified as average, bypass releases likely would not be required for safe <br />operation of the dam but periodically would be required to meet the objectives of the <br />2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations. In most average years, spring peak <br />releases would be limited to powerplant capacity (about 4,600 cfs) with peak releases <br />taking place for about 1 to 8 weeks, usually in the mid-May to late June (but occasionally <br />extending into July) time period. In about 1 out of every 3 average years, bypass releases <br />Executive Summary 0 5-25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.