My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9631
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9631
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9631
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam Draft Environmental Impact Statement Executive Summary.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
refine the plan to best meet the needs of the endangered fish. Reclamation would comply <br />with ESA Section 7 consultation requirements and may make refinements to the plan <br />based on the comments from the Technical Working Group. Reclamation could then <br />present the new plan to the Flaming Gorge Working Group for additional comments. <br />Reclamation could further refine the plan based on information gathered at the Flaming <br />Gorge Working Group Meeting. This process would ensure that the 2000 Flow and <br />Temperature Recommendations and the authorized purposes of Flaming Gorge Dam are <br />considered in a balanced and fair manner as the operational plan is developed. <br />Reclamation's meetings with the Technical Work Group would also provide an <br />opportunity to discuss historic operations in terms of the accomplishments and <br />shortcomings of meeting the 2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations. <br />Reclamation would maintain an administrative record of these meetings to document the <br />planning process. <br />S.13.3.1 Operations in May Through July (Spring Period) <br />Under the Action Alternative, Reclamation would establish a hydrologic classification for <br />the spring period (May through July) based on the April through July forecasted <br />unregulated inflow volume. This forecast is issued by the River Forecast Center <br />beginning in early January and is updated twice per month until the end of July. During <br />the spring period, Reclamation would classify the current hydrology of the Green River <br />system into one of the five hydrologic classifications described in the 2000 Flow and <br />Temperature Recommendations (wet, moderately wet, average, moderately dry, and dry). <br />Table S-3 describes the percent exceedance ranges that would be used for each <br />classification under the Action Alternative. <br />Table S-3.-Percentage Exceedances <br />and Hydrologic Classifications <br />Percentage <br />Hydrologic Exceedance <br />Classification Range <br />Wet <10 <br />Moderately Wet 30 to 10.1 <br />Average 70 to 30.1 <br />Moderately Dry 90 to 70.1 <br />Dry >90 <br />The hydrologic classification would be used to establish the range of flow magnitudes <br />and durations that could potentially be targeted for the approaching spring release period. <br />These targets would be incorporated into a spring operations plan. This plan would <br />be prepared each year by Reclamation under consultation with the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service and Western and in coordination with the Technical Working Group <br />before the spring Flaming Gorge Working Group meeting. The factors listed in table 5.3 <br />of the 2000 Flow and Temperature Recommendations (shown as table S-4), along with <br />the established hydrologic classification, would be considered in the development of the <br />operations plan. <br />Executive Summary -2- S-23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.