Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER V STORAGE ALTERNATIVES <br />There were 953 entries which met the above criteria. For reservoirs with multiple decrees, <br />the decreed amounts were added together and the data base was modified to show one entry <br />per structure with the aggregate storage decree. Adding the decrees may be inappropriate if <br />the multiple list is a refill decree but since it is not possible to determine if the decree is for <br />refill or enlargement, it was felt this approach would select the largest number of reservoirs. <br />In addition, since refill decrees increase the consumptive use of the water released from the <br />reservoir, adding the decrees may be more accurate than only considering the actual reservoir <br />size. After eliminating the duplicate structures from the data base, there were 842 structures <br />remaining. <br />The Recovery Program Water Acquisition Committee has developed a 2,000 AF minimum <br />storage guideline for evaluating the viability of purchasing water from upstream reservoirs. <br />The 22 reservoirs which met this additional criterion are listed in table 6. The reservoirs <br />listed in table 6 represent 94 percent of the decreed storage of the 842 reservoirs. <br />Current Usage of Selected Reservoirs <br />In evaluating the potential of obtaining storage water from these reservoirs, it was necessary <br />to consider the purpose of each reservoir. All of the Colorado Big Thompson (CBT), <br />Dillon, and Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Reservoirs were constructed as part of an effort to <br />capture West Slope water and divert it east. These reservoirs include Granby, Dillon, <br />Willow Creek, and Shadow Mountain. Green Mountain and Ruedi Reservoirs were <br />constructed as compensatory storage for projects which divert water from the western slope. <br />Ruedi Reservoir has been committed to deliver 5,000 AF/year to maintain flows in the <br />Reach. In addition, through changes in the operation of Ruedi Reservoir, an additional 5,000 <br />AF of water will be available to the Reach on an average of at least 4 out of 5 years. <br />Green Mountain Reservoir (GMR) does not deliver water specifically for the Reach, but as <br />was discussed in the description of the operation of the Orchard Mesa check, it does <br />indirectly provide water to the Reach by fulfilling delivery requirements to the irrigation <br />diversions in the Grand Valley. The Williams Fork Reservoir was constructed to replace <br />depletions caused by the Moffat Tunnel diversions and provides an exchange mechanism <br />which allows Dillon Reservoir to fill out of priority. <br />Vega, Cottonwood Lakes No. 1, and Big Creek Reservoirs are part of Reclamation's <br />Collbran Project. Vega was constructed with Federal funds while Cottonwood No.1 and Big <br />Creek Reservoirs were privately constructed and contractually tied to the operation of the <br />project. The project is operated by Reclamation. Rifle Gap Reservoir and Grass Valley <br />Reservoir (a.k.a. Harvey Gap Reservoir) are part of Reclamation's Silt Project. Rifle Gap <br />was constructed with Federal funds while Harvey Gap was privately constructed. The Silt <br />Project is operated by the Silt Water Conservancy District. <br />34