Laserfiche WebLink
II. FISCAL YEAR 1989: MONITORING, DATA <br />ANALYSIS, AND INTEGRATED STUDY PLAN <br />(Note: This list is not arranged by order of impor- <br />tance. Study plans are listed by study area: integra- <br />tion, sediment (including cultural resources and <br />campsite studies), trout fishery, endangered fish, and <br />economics.] <br />A. <br />SEDIMENT STUDIES <br />1. <br />Flow routing model. <br />Major Premise: A reanalysis of the Unsteady Flow <br />Routing Model (original by Reclamation) is neces- <br />sary to refine the prediction of flow routing <br />through the Grand Canyon (the model does not yield <br />the required precision for estimates of magnitude <br />and timing of peaks and troughs of fluctuating <br />flows). The model will be verified with gaging <br />station data. A flow routing model is needed to <br />understand stage/ discharge relationships through- <br />out the study area, identify flow levels at <br />specific sites, and refine sediment transport <br />relationships. The analysis will use existing <br />gaging station data and some additional stage and <br />discharge data from the current study period and <br />study sites. Hydrology studies require a high <br />level of analysis (90%) in order to achieve the <br />1175% Comfort Level" for biological studies. The <br />model will be documented and will interface with <br />U.S. Geological Survey models. <br />Estimated Cost: $10,000 <br />Responsible Parties: Bureau of Reclamation <br />(Reclamation), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Fish <br />& Wildlife Service (FWS). <br />Time to Complete: 6 months. <br />2. <br />Sediment transport program. <br />(a.) Step 1: Development of a sediment sampling <br />strategy. <br />Major Premise: An analysis of uncertainty in <br />estimation of sediment loads and sediment storage <br />changes is required in order to determine the most <br />cost effective scheme of sampling at gaging <br />stations and the best means for estimating storage <br />5