My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8089
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8089
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Assessment Gunnison River Activities, Passageway Around the Redlands Diversion Dam and Interim Agreement to Provide Water for Endangered Fish.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Concerning the effects on hydropower production at the Aspinall Unit, the text of the final EA <br />has been expanded and appropriate tables added to Appendix E. <br />Analysis of the suggestion to pay Redlands Water and Power Company interference charges, if <br />they would agree to bypass flows to the fish, showed it would appear to be a cost-saving idea. <br />However, it should not be necessary, nor appropriate, to formalize such an arrangement for the <br />period of the interim agreement. The agreement will not preclude consideration of this option <br />if the need arises while coordinating operation of the Aspinall Unit during this study period. <br />The present and historic operations of the Aspinall Unit have many economic benefits to <br />agricultural and other water users (including suburban residents who use Redlands Water and <br />Power Company water for lawn irrigation). The interim water agreement has been negotiated <br />to protect as many of these uses as possible and has been endorsed by the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board. <br />Recreation and Aesthetics <br />Three written and one verbal comment stated that the design of the fish passageway would <br />increase the safety hazards to boaters who exit the river above the Redlands Diversion Dam. <br />Three comments also indicated that the program should address public boater access around the <br />diversion. <br />The effect of interim water agreement releases on recreation at Blue Mesa Reservoir was <br />expressed as a concern. The National Park Service pointed out that there is a strong relation <br />between recreation quantity/quality and reservoir elevation. <br />One reviewer asked why the draft EA mentioned trash problems and safety hazards downstream <br />from the Redlands Diversion and would the projects change these problems. <br />The final EA has been expanded to discuss the boating access question. It is recognized that <br />there is a desire for a safe public boater take-out upstream from the Redlands Diversion Dam. <br />It is not believed that the fish passageway will significantly alter existing conditions and this is <br />explained in more detail. As described in the EA, existing public use is minor and often involves <br />trespassing on private property. <br />During preparation of the final EA meetings were held with various recreation interest groups. <br />A meeting was sponsored by the Riverfront Commission involving interested parties. This group <br />concluded that the best solution to the rafter take-out problem was development of an upstream <br />take-out and provisions for an "emergency" take out just upstream from the Redlands Diversion <br />Dam in case rafters missed the public take-out. At this time, this group is actively working <br />toward a solution to the take-out issue. <br />Additional tables have been added to Appendix E of the final EA showing how the interim <br />agreement will affect the water elevation in Blue Mesa Reservoir. This factor is important in <br />55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.