Laserfiche WebLink
passageway. As indicated in the final EA, the Redlands has used BLM land for their structures <br />since at least 1918. The exchange would not adversely affect safety or recreation issues, but in <br />the future it could open opportunities to improve both. <br />Operation and Maintenance of Fish Passageway <br />Questions were asked on how often fish would be removed from the "trap" in the passageway <br />because of possible harm to the fish. <br />At this time, there is no predetermined time schedule for removing fish from the trap. The trap <br />will be monitored frequently to evaluate use and to lessen any impacts to the native fish from <br />predation or injury. Timing offish removal will depend on usage by the fish. <br />Interim Water.Supply Agreement <br />Several comments wanted clarification on the period of months covered by the interim <br />agreement; and several indicated an EIS would be needed before a long-term contract was <br />developed in the future. The question was raised about an alternative to pay power interference <br />payments to the Redlands Water and Power Company in trade for using a portion of their water <br />supply. <br />One comment indicated that by protecting the water users, the agreement could create a <br />repayment situation. Also, suggestions were made on how to clarify the sharing of water <br />shortages. It was also suggested that the interim agreement last until a long-term contract was <br />executed, rather than for a 5-year period. Another reviewer suggested that the agreement <br />provide flows for 12 months rather than the July through October period. <br />Western Area Power Administration suggested that they, and other Recovery Program <br />participants, be included as signatories to the agreement. <br />The agreement provides water to operate the fish passageway and provide downstream flows in <br />the months of July through October. Data collection for the long-term contract will begin in <br />1995 and a decision on whether or not an EIS is needed cannot be made until flow needs and <br />associated impacts are better brown. If the action is considered to have significant impacts on <br />the environment, then an EIS will be required. <br />As long-term water needs are developed, options for obtaining the water will still include storage <br />from Blue Mesa Reservoir, however, looking at power interference payments to furnish water <br />will definitely be considered and may be a cost-effective method of furnishing water in the long <br />run. (The power interference idea simply means that the Redlands Water and Power Company <br />would reduce their diversions, thus increasing river flows, and they would be reimbursed for the <br />power that would have been produced by the water. Irrigation water would not be involved.) <br />If Redlands Water and Power Company agreed and an appropriate compensation rate could be <br />determined, paying power inuerference charges in lieu of releasing era water from Blue Mesa <br />47