My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8089
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8089
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Final Environmental Assessment Gunnison River Activities, Passageway Around the Redlands Diversion Dam and Interim Agreement to Provide Water for Endangered Fish.
USFW Year
1995.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
passageway. As indicated in the final EA, the Redlands has used BLM land for their structures <br />since at least 1918. The exchange would not adversely affect safety or recreation issues, but in <br />the future it could open opportunities to improve both. <br />Operation and Maintenance of Fish Passageway <br />Questions were asked on how often fish would be removed from the "trap" in the passageway <br />because of possible harm to the fish. <br />At this time, there is no predetermined time schedule for removing fish from the trap. The trap <br />will be monitored frequently to evaluate use and to lessen any impacts to the native fish from <br />predation or injury. Timing offish removal will depend on usage by the fish. <br />Interim Water.Supply Agreement <br />Several comments wanted clarification on the period of months covered by the interim <br />agreement; and several indicated an EIS would be needed before a long-term contract was <br />developed in the future. The question was raised about an alternative to pay power interference <br />payments to the Redlands Water and Power Company in trade for using a portion of their water <br />supply. <br />One comment indicated that by protecting the water users, the agreement could create a <br />repayment situation. Also, suggestions were made on how to clarify the sharing of water <br />shortages. It was also suggested that the interim agreement last until a long-term contract was <br />executed, rather than for a 5-year period. Another reviewer suggested that the agreement <br />provide flows for 12 months rather than the July through October period. <br />Western Area Power Administration suggested that they, and other Recovery Program <br />participants, be included as signatories to the agreement. <br />The agreement provides water to operate the fish passageway and provide downstream flows in <br />the months of July through October. Data collection for the long-term contract will begin in <br />1995 and a decision on whether or not an EIS is needed cannot be made until flow needs and <br />associated impacts are better brown. If the action is considered to have significant impacts on <br />the environment, then an EIS will be required. <br />As long-term water needs are developed, options for obtaining the water will still include storage <br />from Blue Mesa Reservoir, however, looking at power interference payments to furnish water <br />will definitely be considered and may be a cost-effective method of furnishing water in the long <br />run. (The power interference idea simply means that the Redlands Water and Power Company <br />would reduce their diversions, thus increasing river flows, and they would be reimbursed for the <br />power that would have been produced by the water. Irrigation water would not be involved.) <br />If Redlands Water and Power Company agreed and an appropriate compensation rate could be <br />determined, paying power inuerference charges in lieu of releasing era water from Blue Mesa <br />47
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.