My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9659
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9659
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:23:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9659
Author
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Title
Price Stubb Fish Passage - Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Grand Junction, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Revised Supplemental Draft Environmental Assessment-Chapter 2-Altematives <br /> <br /> <br />........... ..... <br />+ <br /> <br />Figure 3-Conceptual Design for Conventional Fish Ladder <br /> <br />A fish trap to control upstream movement of nonnative fish was also considered in the <br />preliminary designs for the fish ladder. However, factors such as cost, site limitations, <br />and land ownership at the dam site may make it infeasible to include a fish trap at this <br />location. A fish trap is being constructed at the Grand Valley Project Fish Passage <br />located about 5.3 miles upstream of the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam to prevent upstream <br />movements of nonnative fish above the Grand Valley Project Diversion Dam. <br /> <br />Reclamation also examined constructing a conventional fish ladder on the river-left bank <br />of the Price-Stubb Diversion Dam but determine the design to be cost prohibitive. <br />Limited space between the dam arid Interstate 70 and the lack of access for maintenance <br />also made the design infeasible. <br /> <br />Construction <br /> <br />The fish ladder would be completed under a construction contract. Before the fish ladder <br />could be constructed, Reclamation would coordinate the design, easements and access <br />with the dam and adjoining land owners. Temporary construction easements or permits <br />would also be acquired froni all affected land owners before construction. Reclamation <br />would negotiate protective measures to reduce impacts to private property, rights-of-ways <br />and facilities. Following construction, any damaged area would be restored, as near as <br />practicable, to its original condition. Access to the dam for construction would be from a <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.