7899 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . 12 in 1980 estimated angler use at 29,000 hours with a catch-per-angler hour (CPAH) of 0.83. Most of the trout caught were quality-sized (14 inch) fish. Many anglers put a high value on the opportunity to catch and keep quality-sized trout. They may react negatively to an introduction of a species that they think would interfere with this opportunity. If the conservation pool could be reestablished, an obvious option would be to take advantage of the high productivity and manage the reservoir as a put and grow Snake River cutthroat trout fishery. This management strategy has a track record of success and angler acceptance. Planted tiger muskie could establish a population in the reservoir and at least some fish would be expected to recruit to trophy size. In this case, tiger muskie predation of the fingerling Snake River Cutthroat trout would be significant and may increase fmgerling stocking costs as well as damage the trout fishery. A conservation pool would allow the density of white sucker to increase to the point that it would become a significant tiger muskie food item also. If no conservation pool can be negotiated, then there remains the option of stocking creel-sized trout during the summer months when the reservoir would normally have sufficient water to provide a fishery. Under the put and take management scheme the creel sized rainbow trout would be the mainstay of the tiger muskie diet. However, without a conservation pool it is unlikely that sufficient permanent habitat would exist to recruit many trophy sized tiger muskie. Further, reservoir drawdowns would flush tiger muskie downstream at an unacceptably high rate of escapement. Because Continental Reservoir is located in the Rio Grande drainage, tiger muskie would be unable to escape into waters occupied by endangered fishes of the Colorado River basin. However, during annual summer spills and managed drawdowns, tiger muskie could access North Clear Creek and the mainstream of the Rio Grande River. They would have opportunity to emigrate to areas occupied by longnose dace and Rio Grand Chub (a Species of Special Concern in Colorado) (Table 5). In addition, tiger muskie would have access to portions of the Rio Grande supporting brown and rainbow trout fisheries in the Rio Grande National Forest that are managed for quality angling with special fishing regulations. Part of the special regulation water is on four large private ranches near Creede that cater to summer trout anglers. It is unlikely but remotely possible that tiger muskie would also have access to privately managed Santa Maria Reservoir and Seepage Lake. . . . . . . . .