My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7601
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:10:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7601
Author
Minckley, W. L.
Title
Native Fishes of Arid Lands
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
A Dwindling Resource of the Desert Southwest.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />habit. Some springfishes in the White River live at <br />temperatures exceeding 36.70 C. and at extremely <br />low oxygen concentrations. Most populations are <br />threatened by introduced fishes, but those living in <br />hot, low-oxygen water have less of a problem since <br />the exotic species cannot invade their special habitat. <br />The Monkey Spring pup fish (Fig. 77) of southern <br />Arizona was not so lucky. Largemouth bass were <br />introduced into their habitat, and within a few <br />months, the native species was gone. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 77. Extinct fishes from the Monkey Spring system, <br />Arizona. Above: Monkey Spring pupfish, 55 mm; Below: Gila <br />chub, 15 cm. <br /> <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Of 41 strictly freshwater fishes discussed here, 10 <br />occur only in Mexico, 9 are only in the United <br />States, and 22 species are shared by the two <br />countries, the last serving to illustrate the regional <br />nature of the fauna. Those found only in one or the <br />other country represent in large part local endemics, <br />which demonstrate in their isolation some of the <br />uniqueness of fishes in arid lands. In 1989, 28 <br />(68 %) of the 41 taxa were officially recognized <br />(hereafter listed) as threatened, endangered, or of <br />special concern by the American Fisheries Society. <br />Three species from the region (Las Vegas speckled <br />dace, Pahranagat spinedace, and Monkey Spring <br /> <br />pupfish, not included in the above compilation) were <br />reported to have suffered extinction. <br />Definition of just how much trouble these fishes <br />are actually encountering is a major problem. Fishes <br />are difficult to assess from the standpoint of <br />population status. In fact, they are even often <br />difficult to discuss since they live in water, a <br />medium inconvenient for humans to enter. Fishes are <br />furthermore difficult to observe or capture, and even <br />to identify after they are in hand. Lastly, for some <br />reason they are often considered "second-class <br />citizens" when compared with four-legged, furry or <br />feathered beasts; humans identify more with warm- <br />blooded animals that resemble themselves. <br />Despite this, if one determines that a fish exists <br />only as a hundred or so individuals in a single tiny <br />spring, it can readily be defined as endangered since <br />a single event could destroy it. Widespread species <br />are another matter, and most fishes in this region <br />were, in fact, relatively wide ranging. A fish may <br />become greatly reduced in range, such as the <br />Sonoran topminnow that lived from western New <br />Mexico to the Colorado River then south through <br />Arizona and Sonora. It now occupies fewer than 10 <br />natural localities in the United States. One might <br />also believe this sufficient to define endangerment. <br />However, each existing population consists of <br />hundreds or thousands of individuals, and overall <br />population size may actually number in the millions. ' <br />This is a substantial number when compared with <br />some endangered terrestrial species such as <br />California Condor or Mexican Wolf, which are <br />reduced to only a few individuals. However, a short- <br />lived species such as topminnow may disappear in a <br />year or less when subjected to an efficient predator <br />such as the introduced mosquitofish, so size of local <br />populations may have little to do with its actual <br />status. <br />Others, such as bony tail of the Colorado River <br />mainstream, may be equally as rare as California <br />Condor. Fewer than 50 individuals have been caught <br />despite intensive efforts since 1975. This fish is so <br />rare that it cannot be studied in nature. Further, it <br />appears to be hybridizing with other chubs because <br />the few remaining wild individuals cannot find <br />suitable mates. Biologists have no firm ideas why <br />this species has disappeared. As with both the <br />condor and wolf, artificial propagation has been <br />initiated to perpetuate the bonytail, although it has <br />been difficult to capture enough individuals to <br />establish a viable broodstock. <br />An intermediate state between the topminnow <br />example and that of bony tail involves the razorback <br />sucker, which enjoys one population that exceeds <br />50,000 individuals in Lake Mohave, Arizona- <br />Nevada, yet is almost gone from the remainder of its <br /> <br />39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.