Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Electrofishing <br /> <br />Four electrofishing trips were made in 1993 on the San Juan River. Trips <br />were conducted in April, May, July, and October (Table 1). The April and May <br />trips sampled the lower part of Reach III, from just above the Mixer to Four <br />Corners Bridge (RM 136.6-119.2). The July trip sampled Reaches I and VII. <br />The October trip sampled Reaches II through VI. The April and May trips were <br />conducted specifically to implant radio tags into adult Colorado squawfish for <br />an intensive radio-telemetry study conducted in the summer of 1993. With the <br />exception of rare fish species, and Floy-tagging of channel catfish and common <br />carp for the nonnative fish study, no other fish community data was collected <br />on these two trips. The July and October trips followed the sampling protocol <br />outlined below. <br />A variety of electrofishing boats were used on different sampling trips <br />(Table 8 in Appendix I), but sampling techniques remained constant among <br />trips. Electrofishing proceeded downstream in a continuous fashion from put- <br />in to take-out. One or two netters stood on an elevated platform above the <br />anodes and collected fish as they were drawn into the electrical field. The <br />raft operator maneuvered the boat via oars, monitored the Variable Voltage <br />Pulsator (VVP), and made adjustments to current, voltage, amperage, frequency, <br />and pulse width when necessary. On trips with only two electrofishing rafts, <br />one raft shocked along each shoreline of the river, breaking off into side <br />channels when necessary. When three boats were used, the third boat worked in <br />tandem with one of the shoreline boats. In narrow stretches of river, all <br />three boats worked abreast of one another, covering the entire channel. When <br />one of the shoreline boats entered a secondary channel, the third <br />electrofishing boat shocked the main-channel shoreline until the first boat <br />reentered the main channel. <br />The study area was divided into five-mile sections, with the first four <br />river miles of each section considered non-designated (NO) miles and the fifth <br />mile considered a designated mile (DM). Sampling technique was the same for <br />OM and NO miles. Electrofishing crews began at the upstream end of each mile <br />and collected all the fish they could net as they shocked downstream. All <br />non-target fish collected in NO miles were enumerated by species and returned <br />to the river. All non-target fish collected in OM's were weighed (g), <br />measured for total and standard lengths (mm), and sexed (if possible) before <br />being returned to the river. Channel catfish and common carp were FLOy-tagged <br />before release for another study. <br /> <br />Trammel Netting <br /> <br />Trammel nets (one-inch mesh) were used on a limited basis during all <br />sampling trips. Because of the need to cover a minimum number of river miles <br />each day, trammel nets could not be set in anyone area for long periods. <br />Nets were set across the mouths of a backwaters, slow-moving side channels, or <br />mouths of a tributaries (e.g., Mancos River mouth). After a net was in place, <br /> <br />5 <br />