Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />morphometric variables (Blacklith and Reyment, 1971 <br /> <br />Humphries et <br /> <br />&1., 19(1). <br /> <br />~nlike loadings for PC1, only subsets of the 31 distance measures <br /> <br />had significant scores on PC2 and PC3 (Table 1). <br /> <br />Significant <br /> <br />loadings o~ PC2 were bipolar, scores having both positive and <br /> <br />negative values. <br /> <br />Two general body regions were involved (Table <br /> <br />1; fig. 3). <br /> <br />Four head measurements appeared diagnostic: mouth <br /> <br />length <br /> <br />(Measurement No.2; 0.37); pre-orbital length (No. 14; <br /> <br />o. 63 ); ant e r i 0 r m 0 S t cd g e 0 for bit too c c i pu'irn ( No.4; O. 32 ); and <br /> <br />snout to occiput (No.5; 0.33). <br /> <br />The other significant measure- <br /> <br />ments involved the depth of the mid-region of the body as defined <br /> <br />by the pelvic and medi~n fins: pelvic fin origin to posteriormost <br /> <br />pe.rt of dorsal fin base (No. 26; -0.34); pelvic fin base to <br /> <br />dorsal fin base origin (No. 23; -0.40); dorsal fin base origin <br /> <br />to anal fin base origin (No. 25; -0.35); and posteriormost p,'-\rt <br /> <br />of dorsal fin base to anal fin base origin (No. 28; -0.34). The <br /> <br />anal fin base (No. 10) was related to the truss composed of these <br /> <br />mid-body measurements, loading significantly with the same sign <br /> <br />on PC2 (-0.37). <br /> <br />Although the least depth of the caudal peduncle <br /> <br />(No. 12) has been considered an important differentiating <br /> <br />char~cter (Smith et al., 1979), its loading was not signifi~ant <br /> <br />in the PCA. <br /> <br />Three characters had significant loadings on PC3, each involving <br /> <br />shape of the he,~d region (Table 1; Fig. 3): mouth length (No.2; <br /> <br />~ <br />,. <br />