My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7258
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:06:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7258
Author
Rosenfeld, M. J.
Title
Morphometry in Chubs of the Genus
USFW Year
1986.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />upon visual consideration of the nuchal hump and caudal <br /> <br />peduncle, but plotted as described above. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Significant character loadings indicate that chubs are distin- <br /> <br />guished by differences in two general body regions: <br /> <br />the head and <br /> <br />mid-body. <br /> <br />The two regions had different loading signs, indica- <br /> <br />ting op~osite variational trends. <br /> <br />Mid-body measurements are - <br /> <br />dete~minants of body depth. <br /> <br />Similarly, signTficant PC2 scores <br /> <br />for head-region characters tended to be depth measurements. As <br /> <br />body depth increases, the depth of the head decreases. <br /> <br />Signifi- <br /> <br />cant PC3 loadings for head characters entail horizontal shifting <br /> <br />in the relative positions of pOints defining these measurements, <br /> <br />i.e., these cistance measures were elongated or contracted <br /> <br />dependent on the specimen. <br /> <br />The large nuchal hump found in ~ertain Colorado River chubs is <br /> <br />~onsidered important in chub taxonomy (Miller, 1946). <br /> <br />Aspects of <br /> <br />hump size or shape have been quantified for species identifica- <br /> <br />tions (Smith et al., 1979), although measurements of this <br /> <br />structure have not resulted in clear discriminations (Valdez ~nd <br /> <br />Clemmer, 1982). <br /> <br />Measurements in this study did not directly <br /> <br />irvclve the problematical hump. <br /> <br />Rdther, it entailed those mostly <br /> <br />derived from constructing measurement trusses. <br /> <br />The hump appears <br /> <br />correlated with some of these measurements since peA I03dirgs for <br /> <br />1 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.