Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />0311," <br /> <br />... <br /> <br /> <br />07Z-5~ <br />~--- <br /> <br />~ORPHOMETRY IN CHUBS OF THE GENUS GILA <br /> <br />FROM THE GREEN A~D COLORADO RIVERS, COLORADO AND UTAH: <br /> <br />Principal Component Analysis <br /> <br />:--1 ark J. R 0 s e n f e 1 d . -;:i17 <br />Utah ~useum of Natural History <br />University of Utah <br />Salt Lake City, Utah 8411;:> <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Principal component analysis (PCA) of box-truss and traditional <br />morphometry was used to study morphologic~l variation among UDper <br />Colorado River chubs: "roundtail" and "humpback" chubs as well <br />as suppospd intermediate morphs. Measurements were made from 3 X <br />5 inch black-and-white photographs with a digitizer. Relation- <br />ships of fishes within and between collecting localities were <br />suggested by PCA, these verifiable using biochemical methods: <br />(a) "roundtail" chubs comprise a distinct lineage; (b) "hump- <br />back" chubs and those previously considered intermediate or <br />unidentified morphs are members of the same species, "humpback" <br />chub; (c) hybridization between the two lineages may be rare or <br />non-existant; (d) most Green River collecting sites are inh2bited <br />by "humpback" chubs; although (e) 'rJhirlpool Canyon appears <br />occupi(~d solely by "roundtail" chubs. Discriminating measure- <br />ments were discovered through PCA, those contrasting mid-body and <br />head proportions having diagnostic value. Measurements of the <br />nuchal hump and caudal peduncle do not appear to be necessary for <br />identifications; however, the ability to differentiate seems to <br />depend on specimen size, with smaller congeners resembling each <br />other. <br /> <br />[I qfq fr ] <br />