Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />LaGory, K. E.1, J. W. Hayse I , T. Grand2, and S. F. Railsback2 <br /> <br />J Environmental Assessment Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL; 2 Lang, Railsback, and <br />Associates, Arcata, CA <br /> <br />Preliminary Models of Colorado Pikeminnow Movement, Foraging, Growth, and Survival <br />in Green River Nursery Habitat. Conditions in backwater nursery habitats are thought to play <br />an important role in determining the reproductive success of endangered Colorado pikeminnow <br />(Ptychocheilus lucius) in the Upper Colorado River basin. Age-O fish that use backwaters may be <br />adversely affected by changes in river flow especially those that occur over a short time period <br />such as the daily fluctuations caused by hydroelectric generation at Flaming Gorge Dam. A <br />spatially explicit individual-based model is being developed that consists oftwo components: a <br />physical habitat simulation and a fish simulation. The preliminary formulation for the latter <br />component is presented in this paper. This model simulates the effects of changes in flow and <br />habitat on the movement, foraging, growth, and survival of individual age-O Colorado <br />pikeminnow in the Ouray reach ofthe Green River in Utah. Movement rules predict the <br />involuntary movement offish in response to changes in flow and voluntary movements to adjacent <br />habitats (mainstem or backwaters) in response to changes in habitat-specific potential fitness. Fish <br />are assumed to swim at an optimal foraging speed, which is used to calculate (1) the quantity of <br />prey encountered and consumed; (2) rate of energy expenditure; (3) daily growth rate; and (4) <br />expected survival. Daily growth is calculated from estimated consumption rate and energy <br />expenditures. Survival probabilities are calculated from the fish's length and condition; density of <br />predators; and habitat conditions. The completed model should be a useful tool for evaluating the <br />impacts on age-O Colorado pikeminnow of various Flaming Gorge Dam release scenarios. Work <br />supported by Western Area Power Administration under Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38 with <br />Argonne National Laboratory and EPRI under agreement EP-P3215/CI529 with Lang, Railsback <br />& Assoc. <br /> <br />Nonnative Fish Control <br /> <br />Brunson, R., G. Birchell and B. Williams <br /> <br />Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Vernal, UT <br /> <br />Development of a Northern Pike Control Program in the Middle Green River, Utah. Effort <br />to control Northern pike (Esox lucius) in the Middle Green River was initiated in late March of <br />2001 and continued through mid-June. The purpose of this effort is to develop an effective <br />control program and reduce the density of adults such that predatory and competitive impacts on <br />growth, recruitment, and survival of endangered and other native fishes are minimized. Northern <br />pike were removed from known concentration areas of the middle Green River, including the <br />mouth of Brush Creek, Cliff Creek, Stewart Lake Drain, Ashley Creek, Sportsman Drain and the <br />mouth of the Duchesne River. Other habitats sampled were large, relatively deep backwaters and <br />shoreline areas. Sampling gear used included fyke nets, trammel nets and electro fishing. Trammel <br />nets were regularly used in conjunction with electro fishing as a productive sample method. A total <br />of251 northern pike were removed from the middle Green River from March through June 2001. <br />