Laserfiche WebLink
<br />not prospects for future screenings since samples would be <br /> <br />hard to gather without severe tr~uma or death. <br /> <br />This preliminary electrophoretic study does show that at least <br /> <br />larval and juvenile fishes might be identified as belonging to <br /> <br />either a roundtail or bony tail-humpback lineage or to a hybrid <br /> <br />state between them, using protein electrophoresis. <br /> <br />Young-of-year <br /> <br />sampling typically involves th~ fixation and preservation of <br /> <br />specimens intended for morphological examination. <br /> <br />A larval or <br /> <br />juv~nile sUb-sample preserved ~n dry ice would be required; the <br /> <br />entire animal would be macerated to obtain the requisite liver <br /> <br />proteins. <br /> <br />Electrophoresis of liver proteins indicated that the current <br /> <br />concept of phylogenetic relationships may be incorrect. The <br /> <br />roundtail chub may not be allied closely to either the bonyt~il <br /> <br />or humpback chubs, yet the bony tail chub has been considered a <br /> <br />sub3pecies of the roundtail chub (Ellis, 1914; Uyeno, 19(0). <br /> <br />Phenetic clusterings indicated greater similarities between the <br /> <br />roundtail chub and the Utah chub as well as the tui chub than <br /> <br />between the roundtail chub and either the humpback or bony tail <br /> <br />chubs. <br /> <br />Sample sizes were relatively small as well as not <br /> <br />necessarily representative of populations throughout the Upper <br /> <br />Colorado River, yet the genetic dist2nce separating the "round- <br /> <br />tail" chub from its Colorado River congeners is so great that the <br /> <br />g~netic distinctness of the "roundt21il" chub is likely real and <br /> <br />7 <br />