Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Though nonnative channel catfish (Ictalurns punctatus) have been recognized as the <br />principal predator and competitor affecting humpback chub populations in the lower <br />Yampa River, a highly prolitic and migratory population of smallmouth bass may raise <br />the bar of demise in Yampa Canyon. Anderson (2002) and Fuller (2003) reported that <br />smallmouth bass in the Yampa and Green Rivers have been increasing since 2001. It is <br />24 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Catch rates were correlated to both floodplain size and quantity of submergent <br />vegetation. <br /> <br />Posters <br /> <br />Channel Catfish Control in the Lower Yampa River <br /> <br />Fuller, Mark H. <br /> <br />u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service, Vernal, UT <br /> <br />Since 1998 mechanical removal strategies to reduce sub adult and adult channel catfish <br />abundance in the lower Yampa River have been successful. In 1998 methodologies were <br />tested and in 1999 electrofishing and volunteer assisted angling resulted in significant <br />population reductions in several test reaches (57.4 -81.5%). In 2000, the Vernal Field <br />Office made recommendations to expand the control effort and emphasize reduction of <br />channel catfish abundance in the entire Yampa Canyon for 2001 -2003. Study <br />recommendations from the 1998-99 study included removal strategies based on catfish <br />behavior and flow regimes to increase capture effectiveness. Electrofishing on flows <br />between 3000 and 1000 cfs provided the highest catch rates and effectively sampled <br />shallow higher velocity environments (runs and riffles), and volunteer assisted angling <br />provided the most fish per trip when flows were too low to navigate electrofishing rafts in <br />the canyon. Angling effectively sampled the deeper slower velocity habitat (pools) in <br />late summer during lower water levels and when catfish movement between habitats was <br />minimal. <br /> <br />The majority of catfish collected in the canyon have been between 200 and 400 mm total <br />length and data show a steady decrease in average length over the years. Juvenile catfish <br />(<150 nun) are absent from the canyon. Fyke netting, shoreline electro fishing and <br />seining during other studies have failed to detect yoy channel catfish in the canyon. <br />Thus, recruitment (catfish between three and four years of age) of catfish into the canyon <br />consists of catfish mostly> l50mm TL. <br /> <br />Channel catfish growth is slow in the lower Yampa River. Growth data (Tyus and Nikirk <br />1990) indicates that the most common sized catfish collected from the study area (200 - <br />400 mm) ranged between five to fourteen years of age. Channel catfish mature between <br />250 mm and 400 mm (Carlander 1969). Because growth rates are slow, and densities of <br />larger catfish are fairly low (Modde and Fuller 2000), it appears that we are removing <br />much of the mature catfish population in the canyon. <br />