Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />backwaters and may provide a better understanding of how flow and stage affect <br />backwater habitat quality and use by young pikeminnow. <br /> <br />Recommended Priorities for Geomorphology Research in Endangered Fish Habitats. <br />of the Upper Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />Kirk E. LaGory, John W. Hayse, and David Tomasko <br /> <br />Environmental Assessment Division. Argonne National Laboratory. Argonne. Illinois <br /> <br />We developed and implemented an approach to prioritize river reaches and habitats for <br />geomorphic research in the Upper Colorado River Basin. Recommended priorities are <br />being used by the Recovery Program as it develops a comprehensive research and <br />monitoring program for endangered fish habitats. A scoring system was used to represent <br />the relative importance of(l) existing (or potential) reach use for species and life stages; <br />(2) habitat use for species and life stages; (3) habitat occurrence within planfonn type; <br />and (4) dependencies among habitat characteristics and hydrologic and geomorphic <br />parameters. Scores also were assigned to life stages and species on the basis of sensitivity <br />to environmental variability and population status, respectively. Two workshops <br />involving Upper Basin researchers were held in December 2002 and February 2003 to <br />gather input and assign scores to attributes. A linked-matrix approach was used to <br />combine scores and develop overall (all species combined) and species-specific priorities <br />based on these attributes. Overall priority habitats identified included (1) connected <br />backwaters and side channels in the middle and lower Green River and lower portions of <br />the upper Colorado River; (2) flooded bottomlands in the middle Green, Colorado (near <br />the confluence with the Gunnison), and lower Gunnison Rivers; and (3) spawning bar <br />complexes in the middle Green, Colorado, and Gunnison Rivers. <br /> <br />Cibola High Levee Pond: Annual Report 2003 <br /> <br />Mueller, Gordon I, Jeanette Carpenter I , Paul Marsh2, Chuck Minckley <br /> <br />I USGS; 1 Arizona State University: J USFWS <br /> <br />Bonytail and razorback sucker have once again spawned and produced young at Cibola <br />High Levee Pond (CHLP), Arizona-California. Underwater videography during <br />spawning showed both species fed aggressively on their own eggs. Videos also recorded <br />concentrations (average 0.89 to 3.66 animals/m2) of bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles <br />and red swamp crayfish (ProcambanlS clarkii) which in subsequent tank tests illustrated <br />they both fed on razorback eggs and larvae. <br /> <br />Telemetry studies revealed that adult bonytail were strictly nocturnal, having a fidelity to <br />specific bank cavities during daylight hours. All life stages exhibited schooling behavior. <br />Predator/prey tank experiments revealed that most nonnative young fed on razorback <br />larvae and fry. Literature suggests that at current densities, tadpoles have the potential to <br />consume nearly a million tish lar\'ae per day. Crayfish were also an effective predator of <br />19 <br />