Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Nonnative fish studies in the Yampa River <br /> <br />Hawkins, John, Cameron Walford, and Tasha Sorensen <br /> <br />Lan'al Fish LaboratOlY, Department of Fishery and Wildl~re Biology. Colorado State <br />University, Fort Collins, CO <br /> <br />In the Yampa River, nonnative piscivorous, channel catfish (/ctalllrus pltnctatlls), <br />northern pike (Esox lllcius), and small mouth bass (MicroptentS dolomieu) pose a threat to <br />native and endangered fishes. Channel catfish have occurred in the Yampa River for 75- <br />100 years, northern pike have occupied the river for 25 years, and smallmouth bass have <br />occupied the river in significant numbers only in the last 10 years. Northern pike were <br />stocked into the tributary Elkhead Reservoir in the late 1970s and colonized the Yampa <br />River almost immediately. Smallmouth bass were extremely rare in the Yampa River <br />until 1992 when a rapid draw down at Elkhead Reservoir introduced large numbers into <br />the :1ver. Catfish and smallmouth bass are now abundant downstream of Craig, Colorado <br />and northern pike occur throughout the river. Northern pike also occur upstream in the <br />mainstem Stagecoach Reservoir, where they were illegally stocked. Range of those three <br />species overlaps designated critical habitat for federally listed Colorado pikeminnow <br />(Ptychocheillls 11lCillS), razorback sucker (Xyrallchen texanus), humpback chub (Gila <br />cypha), and bonytail (Gila elegans) in the Yampa River. Management actions to reduce <br />abundance of nonnative piscivorous fish may be necessary to recover the endangered <br />fishes. A key piece of information required for effective management is the effort <br />required to remove a given proportion of the targeted nonnative population. <br /> <br />In 2.003, we designed several studies to evaluate effectiveness of removal of northern <br />pike, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish in the Yampa River. In our 75-mile study <br />reach within critical habitat northern pike and channel catfish were captured, tagged, and <br />rele:ased on three sample occasions. No channel catfish were removed and northern pike <br />were removed only in an 8-mile treatment reach. Smallmouth bass were captured, <br />tagged, and released on tive sample occasions in a 12-mile study reach and were removed <br />only in a 6-mile treatment site of that reach. We describe movement, density. length- <br />frequency, population abundance, and capture probabilities for northern pike, channel <br />catSsh, and smallmouth bass. These results will be useful to design effective control <br />strategies for nonnative fish predators in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Examining Predation Demand by Nonnative Piscivores and its Utility <br />in Evaluating and Prescribing Nonnative Fish Control Strategies <br /> <br />Martinez, Patrick I, Brett Johnson2, and John Hawkins & Kevin Bestgen3 <br /> <br />I Colorado Division of ~Vild/ife, Grand Junction. CO; ! Dept. ofFish & Wi/dlzfe Bio, <br />Colorado State L'ni\'ersity. Fort Collins. CO; .3 Larval Fish Laboratory. Colorado State <br />University, Fort Co/lins, CO <br /> <br />9 <br />