Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C-4 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Irrigated crop depletions were calculated using the SCS TR21 modified Blaney-Criddle <br />consumptive use less effective precipitation (Soil Conservation Service, 1970). When water <br />supplies are insufficient to meet diversion requirements for full crop demand, shortages are <br />simulated following Reclamation Type I study approach (Reclamation, 1971). Reclamation's <br />XCON program was used to compute both nonshorted and shorted irrigation depletions. <br /> <br />Previous modeling of the San Juan River in support of project authorization and <br />Consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) relied on Colorado River <br />Simulation System (CRSS) estimates of the 1929 to 1974 monthly natural flows at Archuleta, <br />New Mexico, and Bluff. As part of the San Juan River Basin modeling exercise, an analysis <br />of the 1929 to 1974 streamflow record was conducted to determine whether there were <br />differences in the statistical properties of the San Juan River Basin hydrology pre- and post- <br />1974. Statistics were calculated using a 20-year moving window to assess changes in the <br />mean flow and the variability and seasonality of the flows. An investigation of the impacts <br />on reservoir storage needed to meet various target yields and yield failure was also <br />performed. The 1974 to 1993 record was found to exhibit significant differences from the <br />prior record in terms of these criteria. It was a relatively wet period. It was therefore <br />determined that inclusion of the 1929-1973 data would likely lead to more reasonable and <br />more stringent estimates of low flows and drought conditions. <br /> <br />Therefore, the monthly 1970 to 1993 natural flows recalculated by Reclamation as explained <br />above were extended from 1969 back to 1929 using a spatial disaggregation model. The <br />particular disaggregation model used preserves the mean, standard deviation, and one- <br />month lag statistics of the hydrologic series. The model relies on key stations with full <br />periods of record (in this case 1929 to 1993) as drivers for the record extension. The natural <br />flows at Archuleta and Bluff were forced, by adjusting stream reach gains and losses to <br />exactly match the CRSS natural flows at Archuleta and Bluff for the period 1929 to 1969. <br /> <br />The 1935 to 1993 monthly gaged record for the San Juan River at Pagosa Springs, Colorado, <br />served as the key station for stations, including all tributaries, above Navajo Reservoir. The <br />gaged record at Pagosa Springs was extended back to 1929 using the spatial disaggregation <br />method with the 1929 to 1934 CRSS natural flow for the San Juan River near Archuleta as its <br />key station. For stations in the Animas drainage, the Animas River at Durango, Colorado, <br />was the key station for 1929 to 1993. The tributaries entering the San Juan River below <br />Farmington (La Plata, Mancos, and McElmo) were disaggregated using the La Plata River <br />at Hesperus, Colorado, as the key station. <br /> <br />From the full set of natural flows (the 1929 to 1969 extension and the 1970 to 1993 <br />Reclamation natural flows) the gains and losses were calculated for each reach by <br />subtracting the upstream stations from the downstream station. However, for stations along <br />the San Juan River (Farmington, Shiprock, and Four Comers, New Mexico), another method <br />was used to find the gain and loss files. There were two reasons for the change: (1) for this <br />study monthly natural flows at these stations needed to be further disaggregated into daily <br />values, and (2) the daily gage error at these stations could be suppressed by using a different <br />method to find gains and losses. <br /> <br />For these stations along the mainstem of the San Juan River, the monthly natural flows for <br />1929 to 1969 were estimated by distributing gains and losses between Archuleta and Bluff <br />