My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9597
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9597
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:01:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9597
Author
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Title
Biological Field and Laboratory Methods for Measuring the Quality of Surface Waters and Effluents.
USFW Year
1973.
USFW - Doc Type
Cincinnati, OH.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BIOLOGICAL METHODS <br /> <br />sample or a plankton haul. However, 10 this <br />section the term "sample" will be used to <br />denote "a set of observations" - the written <br />records themselves. <br /> <br />1.1.6 Parameter and statistic <br /> <br />When we attempt to characterize a popula- <br />tion, we realize that we can never obtain a per- <br />fect answer, so we settle for whatever accuracy <br />and precision that is required. We try to take an <br />adequately-sized sample and compute a number <br />from our sample that is representative of the <br />population. For example, if we are interested in <br />the population mean, we take a sample and com- <br />pute the sample mean. The sample mean is <br />referred to as a statistic, whereas the population <br />mean is referred to as a parameter. In general, <br />the statistic is related to the parameter in much <br />the same way as the sample is related to the pop- <br />ulation. Hence, we speak of population param- <br />eters and sample statistics. <br />Obviously many samples may be selected <br />from most populations. If there is variability in <br />the population, a statistic computed from one <br />sample will differ somewhat from the same <br />statistic computed from another sample. Hence, <br />whereas a parameter such as the population <br />mean is fixed, the statistic or sample mean is a <br />variable, and there is uncertainty associated with <br />it as an estimator of the population parameter <br />which derives from the variation among samples. <br /> <br />2.0 STUDY DESIGN <br /> <br />2.1 Randomization <br /> <br />In biological studies, the experimental units <br />(sampling units or sampling points) must be <br />selected with known probability. Usually, <br />random selection is the only feasible means of <br />satisfying the "known probability" criterion. <br />The question of why known probability is re- <br />quired is a valid one. The answer is that only by <br />knowing the probability of selection of a sample <br />can we extrapolate from the sample to the <br />population in an objective way. The probability <br />allows us to place a weight upon an observation <br />in making our extrapolation to the population. <br />There is no other quantifiable measure of "how <br />well" the selected sample represents the <br />population. <br /> <br />Thus our efforts to select a "good" sample <br />should include an appropriate effort to define <br />the problem in such a way as to allow us to <br />estimate the parameter of interest using a sample <br />of known probability; i.e., a random sample. <br />The preceding discussion should leave little <br />doubt that there is a fundamental distinction <br />between a "haphazardly-selected" sample and a <br />"randomly-selected" sample. The distinction is <br />that a haphazardly-selected sample is one where <br />there is no conscious bias, whereas a randomly- <br />selected sample is one where there is consciously <br />no bias. There is consciously no bIas because tne <br />randomization is planned, and therefore bias is <br />planned out of the study. This is usually accom- <br />plished with the aid of a table of random <br />numbers. A sample selected according to a plan <br />that includes random selection of experimental <br />units is the only sample validly called a random <br />sample. <br />Reference to the definition of the term, <br />sample, at the beginning of the chapter will <br />remind us that a sample consists of a set of <br />observations, each made upon an experimental <br />or sampling unit. To sample randomly, the <br />entire set of sampling units (population) must be <br />identifiable and enumerated. Sometimes the task <br />of enumeration may be considerable, but often <br />it may be minimized by such conveniences as <br />maps, that allow easier access to adequate <br />representation of the entity to be sampled. <br />The comment has frequently been made that <br />random sampling causes effort to be put into <br />drawing samples of little meaning or utility to <br />the study. This need not be the case. Sampling <br />units should be defined by the investigator so as <br />to eliminate those units which are potentially of <br />no interest. Stratification can be used to place <br />less emphasis on those units which are of less <br />interest. <br />Much of the work done in biological field <br />studies is aimed at explaining spatial distri- <br />butions of population densities or of some <br />parameter related to population densities and <br />the measurement of rates of change which <br />permit prediction of some future course of a <br />biologically-related parameter. In these cases the <br />sampling unit is a unit of space (volume, area). <br />Even in cases where the sampling unit is not a <br />unit of space, the problem may often be stated <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.