Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />Status of the Species <br /> <br />apparently recent invaders (since 1900) to.the northern portions of the LCR Valley. Crayfish were <br />introduced for use as a fish bait about 1934 and may be a limiting factor determining rail <br />occurrence today. <br /> <br />Population Estimates <br /> <br />In 1987, the Yuma clapper rail population size in the LCR Valley was estimated to be between 400 <br />and 750 individuals in the United States, with 450-970 in Mexico (Eddleman 1989). In 1994, the <br />last year a full river-wide survey was taken, the population on the Colorado River in the United <br />States was estimated to be 1,145 individuals. This figure is based on call-counts taken between <br />late April and mid-June, the period of peak responses to taped calls (Todd 1986, Bennett and <br />Ohmart 1978, Montgomery 1987). The percentage of breeding birds responding to taped <br />vocalizations has been estimated at 70-80% for paired birds and 90-95 % for unpaired rails (Smith <br />1975, Bennett and Ohmart 1978). These estimates are based on knowing the locations of all <br />vocalizing birds from repeated visits to study marshes, then determining the percentage of the birds <br />that responded during call-count surveys, but see Eddleman (1989). Table 8 shows the total <br />number of responses to taped calls from 1990 to 1995. Based on the annual call count survey taken <br />on the LCR, the Yuma clapper rail population appears to be stable. Overall associated habitat <br />trends have been downward, however. <br /> <br />Rangewide Present Status <br /> <br />Population numbers of the Yuma clapper rail appear to be stable. However, the habitat throughout <br />the species' range is not secure. Due to daily and seasonal fluctuations in river flow, breeding <br />habitat for the Yuma clapper rail cannot establish permanently along the main channel. Many of <br />the backwaters have also undergone successional changes or were adversely impacted by siltation <br />or channel degradation due to the high flows of 1983 and 1984. These backwaters no longer <br />provide habitat for the rail. However, the Yuma clapper rail appears to expand into desired habita t <br />when it becomes available. This is evidenced by the colonization of the California Department of <br />Fish and Game Finne-Ramer habitat management unit in Southern California. This unit was <br />modified to provide marsh habitat specifically for Yuma clapper rail. A substantial resident <br />population exists there. <br /> <br />70 <br />