|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />1\
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />a
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />t
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />,1
<br />I
<br />
<br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION
<br />
<br />Status of the Species
<br />
<br />preclude a complete description of this subspecies' former distribution and abundance. However,
<br />the more than 600 egg, nest, and specimen records available from museums throughout the U.S.
<br />in combination with State, county, and local faunal accounts from the fIrst half of the 20th Centur y
<br />indicate that, historically, the southwestern willow flycatcher was more widespread and, at least,
<br />locally abundant.
<br />
<br />Phillips (1948) first described E.t, extimus from a specimen collected by Gale Monson on the lower
<br />San Pedro River near Feldman, AZ (Pinal Co.). The taxonomic validity of E,t. extimus was
<br />subsequently reviewed by Hubbard (1987), Unitt (1987), and Browning (1993), and has been
<br />accepted by most authors (e. g., Aldrich 1951, Behle and Higgins 1959, Phillips et al. 1964,
<br />Oberholser 1974, Monson and Phillips 1981, Harris et al. 1987, Schlorff 1990, Harris 1991).
<br />Unitt (1987) reviewed historical and contemporary records of E.t. extimus throughout its range,
<br />determining that it had II declined precipitously. . . II and that,
<br />
<br />"although the data reveal no trend in the past few years, the population is clearly
<br />much smaller now than 50 years ago, and no change in the factors responsible for
<br />the decline seem likely. "
<br />
<br />Overall, Unitt (1987) documented the loss of more than 70 breeding locations rangewide, including
<br />locations along the periphery and within core drainages that form this subspecies' range. Unitt
<br />estimated that, rangewide, the southwestern willow flycatcher population probably was comprised
<br />of 500 to 1000 pairs. Because more recent rangewide survey data was not available at the time of
<br />Unitt's review, he did not evaluate potential dispersal and recolonization that may have occurred
<br />following extirpation. Data presented below, however, indicates that after four years of rangewide
<br />surveys fewer than 500 southwestern willow flycatchers have been documented.
<br />
<br />Below is a State-by-State comparison of historic and current data. Since 1992 more than 800
<br />historic and new locations have been surveyed rangewide to document the status of the
<br />southwestern willow flycatcher (some sites in southern California have been surveyed since the late
<br />1980s). Survey efforts in most States were done under the auspices of the Partners In Flight
<br />program, which served as the coordinating body for survey training sessions and review and
<br />synthesis of data. The extensive and, in some case, intensive nature of these efforts have provided
<br />a critical baseline on current distribution, abundance, and reproductive success rangewide.
<br />
<br />California
<br />
<br />The historic range of E,t. extimus in California apparently included all lowland riparian areas in
<br />the southern third of the State. It was considered a common breeder where suitable habitat existed
<br />(Wheelock 1912, Willett 1912, 1933, Grinnell and Miller 1944). Unitt (1984, 1987) concluded
<br />that it was once common in the Los Angeles basin, the San Bernardino/Riverside area, and San
<br />Diego County. Specimen and egg/nest collections confirm its former distribution in all coastal
<br />
<br />59
<br />
|