Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />1\ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />a <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,1 <br />I <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />Status of the Species <br /> <br />preclude a complete description of this subspecies' former distribution and abundance. However, <br />the more than 600 egg, nest, and specimen records available from museums throughout the U.S. <br />in combination with State, county, and local faunal accounts from the fIrst half of the 20th Centur y <br />indicate that, historically, the southwestern willow flycatcher was more widespread and, at least, <br />locally abundant. <br /> <br />Phillips (1948) first described E.t, extimus from a specimen collected by Gale Monson on the lower <br />San Pedro River near Feldman, AZ (Pinal Co.). The taxonomic validity of E,t. extimus was <br />subsequently reviewed by Hubbard (1987), Unitt (1987), and Browning (1993), and has been <br />accepted by most authors (e. g., Aldrich 1951, Behle and Higgins 1959, Phillips et al. 1964, <br />Oberholser 1974, Monson and Phillips 1981, Harris et al. 1987, Schlorff 1990, Harris 1991). <br />Unitt (1987) reviewed historical and contemporary records of E.t. extimus throughout its range, <br />determining that it had II declined precipitously. . . II and that, <br /> <br />"although the data reveal no trend in the past few years, the population is clearly <br />much smaller now than 50 years ago, and no change in the factors responsible for <br />the decline seem likely. " <br /> <br />Overall, Unitt (1987) documented the loss of more than 70 breeding locations rangewide, including <br />locations along the periphery and within core drainages that form this subspecies' range. Unitt <br />estimated that, rangewide, the southwestern willow flycatcher population probably was comprised <br />of 500 to 1000 pairs. Because more recent rangewide survey data was not available at the time of <br />Unitt's review, he did not evaluate potential dispersal and recolonization that may have occurred <br />following extirpation. Data presented below, however, indicates that after four years of rangewide <br />surveys fewer than 500 southwestern willow flycatchers have been documented. <br /> <br />Below is a State-by-State comparison of historic and current data. Since 1992 more than 800 <br />historic and new locations have been surveyed rangewide to document the status of the <br />southwestern willow flycatcher (some sites in southern California have been surveyed since the late <br />1980s). Survey efforts in most States were done under the auspices of the Partners In Flight <br />program, which served as the coordinating body for survey training sessions and review and <br />synthesis of data. The extensive and, in some case, intensive nature of these efforts have provided <br />a critical baseline on current distribution, abundance, and reproductive success rangewide. <br /> <br />California <br /> <br />The historic range of E,t. extimus in California apparently included all lowland riparian areas in <br />the southern third of the State. It was considered a common breeder where suitable habitat existed <br />(Wheelock 1912, Willett 1912, 1933, Grinnell and Miller 1944). Unitt (1984, 1987) concluded <br />that it was once common in the Los Angeles basin, the San Bernardino/Riverside area, and San <br />Diego County. Specimen and egg/nest collections confirm its former distribution in all coastal <br /> <br />59 <br />