Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />Status of the Species <br /> <br />of cottonwood or willow with subcanopies and a dense understory of mixed species also difficult <br />to penetrate (Type IV Table 3). <br /> <br />V) dense mixtures of native broadleaf trees and shrubs as in number 4 above mixed with <br />exotics such as saltcedar or Russian olive primarily in the understory; dense ground-level <br />tangles difficult to penetrate sometimes interspersed with small openings (Type V Table <br />3). <br /> <br />The size and shape of occupied riparian habitat patches vary considerably. Southwestern willow <br />flycatchers have been found nesting in patches as small as 0.8 hectare (ha) (e.g. Grand Canyon) <br />and as large as several hundred hectares (e.g. Roosevelt Lake, Lake Mead). When viewed from <br />above, the mixed vegetation types (numbers III - V, above) often appear as a mosaic of plant <br />species and patch shapes and sizes. In contrast, narrow, linear riparian habitats one or two trees <br />wide do not appear to contain attributes attractive to nesting flycatchers. However, flycatchers <br />have been found using these habitats during migration. <br /> <br />Open water, cienegas, marshy seeps, or saturated soil are typically in the vicinity of flycatcher <br />nests. Southwestern willow flycatchers have been documented nesting in areas where nesting <br />substrates (that is, trees or shrubs) were in standing water (Sferra et al. 1995 and 1996, R. <br />McKernan unpubl. data), At some locations, particularly during drier years, water or saturated <br />soil is only present early in the breeding season (Le., May and part of June). However, the total <br />absence of water or visibly saturated soil has been documented at sites where the river channel ha s <br />been modified (e.g., creation of artificial channels), where modification of subsurface flows has <br />occurred (e.g., agricultural seepage), or as a result of natural changes in river channel <br />configuration. <br /> <br />Nest Placement and Nesting Substrate <br /> <br />Southwestern willow flycatcher nests are typically placed in the fork of a branch with the nest cup <br />supported by several small-diameter vertical stems. The main branch from which the fork <br />originates may be oriented vertically, horizontally, or at another angle; stem diameter for the main <br />supporting branch can be as small as three to four centimeters (em). Vertical stems supporting th e <br />nest cup are typically one to two em in diameter. Occasionally, southwestern willow flycatchers <br />place their nests at the juncture of stems from separate plants, sometimes different plant species. <br />Those nests are also characterized by vertically-oriented stems supporting the nest cup. Spencer <br />et al. (1996) measured the distance between flycatcher nests and shrub/tree center for 38 nests in <br />monotypic saltcedar and mixed native broadleaf/saltcedar habitats. In monotypic saltcedar stands <br />(n=31), nest placement varied from 0.0 meters(m) (center stem of shrub or tree) to 2.5 m. In the <br />mixed riparian habitat (n=7), nest placement varied from 0.0 to 3.3 m. <br /> <br />Nest height relative to the base of the nest substrate also varies across the southwestern willow <br /> <br />52 <br />