My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8031
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 3:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8031
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Fish and Wildlife Service Final Biological and Conference Opinion on Lower Colorado River Operations and Maintenance - Lake Mead to Southerly International Boundary.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BIOLOGICAL OPINION <br /> <br />Status of the Species <br /> <br />the floodplain and the associated riparian areas, marshes, and backwaters upstream. Riverine main <br />channel habitats are also lost. Spawning and nursery habitats may be compromised or lost <br />completely. For fish species accustomed to small backwaters, reservoirs the size of Lake Mead <br />represent new habitats and individuals must adapt to the new conditions in order to survive. <br />Waters released from deep within the reservoir are cold year round; these releases create water <br />temperatures that are generally too cold to support the native fish fauna of the Lower Colorado. <br />However, cold water is conducive to trout reintroduction and establishment, thus these releases <br />result in loss of habitat available to native fish and in maintenance of a non-native predator. <br /> <br />Dam operators release water primarily in response to entitlements and contract orders and to <br />prevent flood damage. Changes in flows from dams have effects to natural channel migrations, <br />creation, maintenance and destruction of marshes, backwaters and stands of riparian vegetation, <br />spawning or migratory cues based on flow levels, and water quality parameters. When water is <br />diverted from the river, flow reductions are apparent below each diversion. Flu ctuations in daily, <br />weekly and monthly releases and diversions have significant adverse effects to shallow water areas. <br />For the native fish species, effects to local migration, spawning and nursery areas, and alteration <br />in habitat patterns and distribution occur. <br /> <br />Control of the released water is also necessary. Rapid transport of water from the dam to the <br />diversion point minimizes loss to evaporation and seepage into the groundwater. Straight, <br />stabilized channels achieve this, but with a resultant loss of meanders, often cutting backwaters and <br />marshes off from the mainstem river. Even if not cut off, higher velocity water in the channel cut s <br />a deeper bed, permitting water to drain from wetland areas. The fish species in this consultation <br />depend considerably on backwater type habitats or main channel habitats with lower velocities. <br />Because flows and velocities will vary over a day or week depending upon release, entrapment and <br />stranding become threats to individuals. <br /> <br />Non-native fish introductions have resulted in the establishment of a much more diverse fis h fauna <br />than existed in the past. Many of these fish species are potentially predators or competitors with <br />the native fish. Survival strategies that worked successfully before the non-natives arrived have <br />not appeared to work since. While specific evidence for predation or competition between native <br />and non-native fish is often not available, sufficient evidence exists to indicate that these effects <br />occur (Bestgen 1990, Minckley et al. 1991), The effects range from predation on eggs, larvae and <br />juveniles to contemporaneous use of the same habitats resulting in some level of competition for <br />food, space, and protection. The adaptability of the non-native fish is evident even in relatively <br />undisturbed river reaches such as those found in portions of the Upper Basin, where non-native fis h <br />have established populations and native fish populations have declined. <br /> <br />Almost all areas of designated critical habitat for native fish were degraded by past actions and <br />have been kept in that condition by the presence of non-native fish, development activities, and <br />maintenance and operation of dams in the Colorado River Basin. Add itional actions that continue <br /> <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.