Laserfiche WebLink
<br />At least four studies have shown predation by channel catfish,green sunfish and carp on <br />razorback sucker eggs and larvae. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Why these fish are now endangered <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />The fish are now endangered because of human impact on their habitat over the past 100 years. <br />The two types of habitat alterations that appear to have had the greatest impact have been water <br />development and introductions of non-native fish. Hundreds of dams have been constructed; <br />river flows have been cut by a third; and more than 40 species of non-native fish have been <br />introduced in the upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />Water development <br /> <br />Human population growth since the turn of the century has created a significant demand for <br />water and hydroelectric power in western states. To'meet that demand, hundreds of water <br />projects, including dams, canals and irrigation projects, have been constructed on the Colorado <br />River and its tributaries. Water projects have restricted the fish to about 25 percent of their <br />former range and have blocked some of the spawning migration routes of the Colorado <br />squawfish and other species. The river has been "channelized" by dikes and other barriers that <br />block the fishes' access to slower moving backwaters and riverside wetlands. Also, tailwaters six <br />to 20 miles downstream from dams can be as much as 15 degrees colder than the rare fishes' <br />preferred habitat. Downstream of Lake Powell, dams have segmented the once free-flowing, <br />silty and wann waters of the Colorado River into a series of lakes connected by cold, clear <br />waters. <br /> <br />Introductions of non-native ,fish <br /> <br />Introductions of non-native fish into rivers, lakes and reservoirs also have taken a toll on the <br />native fish. Historically, there were only 14 fish species in the upper Colorado River Basin. Then <br />in the late 1800s, private citizens and state and federal wildlife agencies began stocking <br />, non-native fish into lakes, reservoirs and streams in the Colorado River drainage. Now the four <br />endangered fish have to compete with more than 40 non-native species. <br /> <br />Many of the non-natives are efficient predators that prey on the eggs and young of en,dangered <br />fish. They also compete with native fish for food and space, often with greater success. Several <br />studies have documented these effects. For example: <br /> <br />In some areas of the upper Colorado River basin, the percentage of native fish is quite low. <br />At the confluence of the Colorado and Green rivers in Utah, biologists have found that 95 <br />percent of the fish species are non-native; only 5 percent of the fish that now exist in this <br />part of the river basin are native. <br />