Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />depressions that are filled by groundwater and by <br />irrigation return flows, Mitchell (1995) identified <br />308 ponds (both public and private) representing <br />878 surface acres along the Colorado and Gunnison <br />rivers. Many of these ponds are less than 5 acres in <br />surface area. On the Colorado River, 73 percent of <br />the ponds are privately owned. On the Gunnison, <br />44 percent of the ponds are privately owned <br />(Mitchell 1995). By comparison, there are only a <br />handful of (maybe 10) gravel pits along the 80-mile <br />segment of the Green River between Pariette Draw <br />and Dinosaur National Monument. <br /> <br />Alternative 1 - No Action <br /> <br />Existing land use practices within the floodplain are <br />expected to continue. Vegetation within the <br />floodplain of the Upper Basin is currently a mix of <br />both native and nonnative species. Disturbances <br />often result in an environment that favors nonnative <br />species, Under the No Action alternative, <br />continuation of floodplain land use practices may <br />increase surface acreage of tamarisk, whitetop, and <br />other nonnative species and noxious weeds. <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Protection and Enhancement <br />of Flooded Bottomlands by Acquisition <br /> <br />On floodplain properties that are not acquired, land <br />use activities would continue. On acquired <br />properties, land use activities would be also be <br />allowed to continue as long as they do not <br />adversely affect the endangered fishes. Therefore, <br />the response of vegetation where properties are <br />simply acquired and protected (i.e., no habitat <br />enhancements) should be the same as with the No <br />Action alternative. <br /> <br />On properties where habitats are enhanced, <br />however, there will likely be some vegetational <br />changes. By restoring floodability, the area would <br />be expected to revert back to a riparian wetland <br />with associated wetland vegetation, The resultant <br />vegetation would consist of species that can <br />withstand seasonal flooding on an annual basis. <br />Mature cottonwoods would be avoided during <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />habitat enhancement activities. <br /> <br />Pond Distribution <br /> <br />. Total' of Ponds <br />. >0.5 - 1.0 acres <br />. >5.0 - 25 acres <br /> <br />. 0 - 0.5 acres <br />. >1.0 - 5.0 acres <br />. >25 acres <br /> <br />250 <br />200 <br />. <br />~ 150 <br />u <br />0( 100 <br />., 50 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado <br /> <br />Gunnison <br />River& <br /> <br />Green <br /> <br />E. Water Resources <br /> <br />Water rights in Colorado and Utah have always <br />followed the western appropriation doctrine in the <br />allocation of water resources. In the past, a water <br />right for surface water was acquired by the <br />diversion of water and its application to a beneficial <br />use that resulted in water depletion. Today, the <br />instream use of water can be acquired for fish and <br />wildlife. Streamflows in the Upper Colorado, <br />Green, and Gunnison rivers are regulated by <br />releases from high dams for irrigated agriculture <br />and power generation. <br /> <br />Alternative 1 - No Action <br /> <br />The acquisition of water rights and releases from <br />reservoirs would continue as in the past. Water <br />quantity and quality would remain essentially the <br />same. <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Protection and Enhancement <br />of Flooded Bottomlands by Acquisition <br /> <br />Along the Upper Colorado, Green, and Gunnison <br />rivers, water rights will not need to be acquired, so <br />impacts to other water users are not expected to <br /> <br />III-7 <br />