Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Where the width of the floodplain in broad, alluvial <br /> <br />i <br />. ~!; <br />r:.. '_~. ,~y <br />~~.!.II <br />PloodpW.. <br /> <br />A <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />777 Tl~Z.LzI <br />i/~~~!L-..L.-' PlDodplaill depr...io.. <br />'~ <br /> <br /> <br />FI~ure 3.2. . Cross.section of river channel and quality <br />areas that would be inundated during overbank flooding <br /> <br />valley reaches averages approximately 3,000 feet; <br />in narrow, canyon-bound reaches, the width <br />averages approximately 500 feet. The quality <br />locations for acquisition of floodplain habitats <br />would be in the broad, alluvial valleys where the <br />productivity of zooplankton as food for larval and <br />juvenile fishes is high (Cooper and Severn 1994 <br />a,b,c,d; Mabey and Schiozawa 1993), The <br />floodplain in the narrow, canyon reaches of Upper <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br /> <br />-~ <br />6,/ <br />~Yftr <br /> <br />/ r.lou'i <br />I N~CUlfOll <br />, ..... <br /> <br />rip re 3-3. - CroES-lection of river channel and floodplains in <br />narrow canyon reaches inundated during overbank flooding <br /> <br />Basin rivers is relatively unaltered by humans so <br />these areas will not be as high a priority for <br />acquisition. <br /> <br />The proposed project will entail acquisition and, <br />where warranted, enhancement of up to 10,000 <br />acres of the most floodable lands within the Upper <br />Basin. The total acreage will include up to 5,750 <br />acres along the Green River; up to 3,500 acres <br />along the Colorado River; and up to 750 acres <br />along the Gunnison River. Acreage values are <br />based on relative differences in habitat availability <br />among the target geographic areas. Although <br />monitoring and evaluation will occur throughout <br />the duration of the project, review and re- <br />evaluation will be conducted upon achieving the <br /> <br />target acreage. At that time, if it is determined that <br />additional acreage is needed to achieve and sustain <br />species' recovery, then a new EA will need to be <br />developed. <br /> <br />J <br />J <br />I <br />J <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />1 <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />B. Socio-Economic Factors, <br /> <br />Mesa County, Colorado, is the most populated of <br />the areas considered in this EA. Most of the <br />people reside in the urban communities, with just <br />over one-third (40,125) in Grand Junction, <br /> <br />Garfield County, Colorado, surrounds the city of <br />Rifle, which has a population of approximately <br />6,000, <br /> <br />City of Delta is approximately 4,000 with another <br />4,000 persons within a 5-mile radius of the city. <br />The population of Delta County, Colorado, is <br />projected to increase approximately 16% by the <br />year 2000. <br /> <br />Uintah County, Utah, has the slowest population <br />growth rate within the project area. Its largest city <br />is Vernal with a population of 7,900 persons. <br /> <br />Population Growth <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br /> <br />1997 <br /> <br />o 20 40 60 80 100 120 <br />Population (Units of 1000) <br /> <br />Legend <br /> <br />. Ulnlllh County, UT <br />. Garfield County, CO <br /> <br />. D...\ +a. County, CO <br />II Mesa County, Co <br /> <br />As the populations of these areas grow, floodplain <br />areas are converted to cities and towns or farms. <br />They are lost to flooding because of dikes and <br />levees used to safeguard fields and homes that are <br />built within the floodplain. <br /> <br />III-2 <br />