My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9669
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9669
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:55:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9669
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Title
Policy and Guidelines for Planning and Coordinating Recovery of Endangered and Threatened Species.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1-12 <br /> <br />Population viability analysis concepts may prove useful in developing <br />recovery objectives and criteria. Studies to determine probable population <br />viability, and the optimum number and spatial arrangement of populations, <br />may be specified as tasks in the plan. <br /> <br />Although determining the appropriate spatial arrangement and number of <br />populations might require further research, some preliminary targets should <br />be identified. Populations should be defined and located so that a single <br />event, however catastrophic, would be unlikely to eliminate more than one <br />population. Delisting would generally require more viable populations <br />than would be required for downlisting. It might not be necessary for <br />recovery criteria to match any historical population level, if a lower <br />level will ensure the long-term survival of the species as a natural <br />component, of its ecosystem. There may be cases where not enough habitat <br />remains to support a population that meets viability criteria. In these <br />cases, full recovery is clearly not achievable, and the plan should clearly <br />state why delisting is not a practical objective. In some cases, <br />evaluating the ability of the ecosystem to support viable populations can <br />be a recovery task. <br /> <br />All plans should state that the reclassification criteria are <br />preliminary, and that they may be revised on the basis of new information <br />(including research specified as recovery tasks). <br /> <br />j <br />~ <br /> <br />B. Narrative Outline for Recoverv Actions Addressinq Threats <br /> <br />This section should be concise and action-oriented. Actions not known <br />to be required for recovery, even though possibly beneficial, may be <br />included. Though most of the tasks included in the outline should be those <br />that are expected to be carried out in the near future, all tasks necessary <br />to achieve full recovery of the species should be identified. Limiting <br />the Narrative Outline to tasks that are expected to be carried out in the <br />near future will sacrifice long-term planning for short-term goals and <br />will not give an accurate assessment of what is necessary to achieve the <br />stated recovery objective. If all tasks known are outlined, time frames <br />can be set as "to be determined" if they are dependent on the out~ome of <br />earlier planned tasks. <br /> <br />A stepdown outline is not required; however, plan preparers should be <br />familiar with the stepdown process because it may be a useful tool in task <br />definition. Regional Directors may include stepdown outlines in plans at <br />their discretion. <br /> <br />The narrative outline should step down recovery needs as far as is <br />necessary to reach the task level. Tasks are items that can be funded or <br />permitted independently. For example, under "Gather life history <br />information on Species X," do not list "Study diet" and "Study social <br /> <br />OS/25/90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.