Laserfiche WebLink
<br />14 <br /> <br />IV. REFERENCES: <br /> <br />General Accounting Office. 1979. Endangered Species - A Controversial <br />Issue Needing Resolution. Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />General Accounting Office. 1988. Endangered Species - Management <br />Improvements Could Enhance Recovery Program. Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />Lande, Russell. 1988. Genetics and Demography in Biological Conservation. <br />Science 24(1):1455-1460. <br /> <br />Shaffer, Mark L. 1981. Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation, <br />Bioscience 43(2):131-134. <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1973. Tactical Planning in Fish and <br />Wildlife Management and Research. Resource Publication 123. <br />Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Appendix I. Priority System. <br />pp. i-iv. In: Endangered Species Program Management Document. <br />Washington, D.C. <br /> <br />i <br />t <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. <br />ranking candidate species. <br />6(8):1. <br /> <br />1981. Service prepares guidelines for <br />Endangered Species Technical Bulletin <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1983. Endangered and Threatened Species <br />Listing and Recovery Priority Guidelines. Federal Register, <br />48(184):43098 and 51985. <br /> <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1988. Recovery 2000. Endangered Species <br />Division, Federal Building, Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minnesota. <br /> <br />OS/25/90 <br />