My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8017
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:55:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8017
Author
U.S. Department of the Interior, B. o. R.
Title
Finding of No Significant Impact, Management and Control of Nonnative Fish Species in Floodplain Ponds along the Upper Colorado and Gunnison Rivers.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mitchell (1995) identified 308 ponds -- 253 along the Colorado River with <br />a total surface area of 721 acres and 61 along the Gunnison River with a <br />total surface area of 197 acres. Mitchell reported that most of these ponds <br />were less than 5 acres in surface area. The tota 1 number . of 308 ponds <br />incl udes the Upper Colorado River from the Colorado-Utah state 1 ine upstream <br />to Palisade, Colorado. That number does not include numerous ponds that <br />occur in the floodplain from Palisade upstream to Rifle, Colorado. There <br />are numerous ponds along the Upper Colorado and Gunnison rivers that will <br />serve as alternate feeding areas for fish-eating birds. Since nonnative fish <br />would be removed from only a small proportion of the ponds in the project <br />area in any single year (not more than 25 ponds or 8% of the 308 ponds <br />identified by Mitchell (Martinez and Nesler 1996), many other ponds would <br />still be available as alternate feeding areas. <br /> <br />In addition, adequate shallow backwaters of the rivers and embayments <br />connected to the rivers contain numerous small fishes that are available to <br />bi rds that depend to a 1 arge extent on fi sh as food. These habi tats, <br />adjacent to the floodplain, would likely provide suitable alternative <br />habitats for food, cover, and nesting by various birds. Some reclaimed <br />floodplain ponds will be stocked with either young endangered fishes or <br />sportfish. Other ponds will be reconnected to the rivers as part of the <br />Recovery Program effort to restore bottoml and habitats. Fi sh in these <br />habitats will be available as a forage base for both avian and terrestrial <br />wildlife. Reclaimed floodplain ponds that remain fishless will provide <br />larger numbers of aquatic invertebrates that are used as food by other bird <br />species such as shorebirds and waterfowl. Some ponds, formed from gravel <br />mining operations, are too deep and contain only a small area of shallow <br />water that can be used for feeding by wading birds. In the floodplain areas <br />where these ponds are located, there are numerous shallow backwaters and <br />embayments connected to the rivers containing small fish that are available <br />as food for piscivorous birds. <br /> <br />One piscivorous bird, the great blue heron, is very common in the project <br />area. Great blue heron rookeries are found in the cottonwood riparian zone <br />in floodplains along the Colorado River in the Grand Valley, in the vicinity <br />of DeBeque, and upstream as well as downstream near Rifle (Colorado Division <br />of Wi 1 dl i fe Database 1997). Most great bl ue herons are migratory in <br />Colorado -- birds arrive at the rookeries in late February and disperse from <br />the sites as the young fledge. Since the great blue heron feeds by wading <br />in shallow waters, many of the ponds in the floodplain (particularly those <br />remaining from gravel mining operations) are too deep for this species or <br />other wad i ng bi rds to feed effect i ve 1 y. These bi rds wou1 d seek shallow <br />ponds that are natural depressions in the floodplain or other shallow <br />environments such as river shorelines, backwaters, and embayments. <br />Therefore, the impact on this common species by removal of nonnative fish <br />species from floodplain ponds should be very minimal. <br /> <br />Some fi sh that are kill ed wi th rotenone will be eaten by some bi rds. <br />However, rotenone is nontoxic to birds at the concentrations used to kill <br />fish (Bradbury 1986). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated to <br />piscivorous birds that feed on dying fish because it is highly unlikely that <br />they would not eat enough of the fish killed by rotenone to cause toxicity <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.