Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 LARVAL CHARACTERIS1. ~ <br /> <br />at the genus or species levels. Specific identifica- <br />tion relies largely on meristics such as myomere and <br />fin ray counts, morphometrics such as snout to vent <br />lengths, and melanistic (brown or black) pigment <br />patterns. In addition, the size at which certain <br />developmental events occur and the form of various <br />structures can be useful. There is often a notice- <br />able amount of intra- as well as inter-regional <br />variability in many of the characters to be discussed. <br />Awareness of this variability or its possible <br />presence, and use of several diagnostic characters, <br />if possible, will increase confidence in identifica- <br />tion while reducing the probability of error. <br /> <br />Myomeres: Myomeres, because they are obvious <br />morphological features and relatively consistent in <br />number and position, are one of the most useful <br />characters available for identification of larvae <br />above (and sometimes at) the specific level, <br />especially for protolarvae and mesolarvae. They <br />begin as part of the embryonic somites and are <br />usually formed in their full complement prior to <br />hatching. Throughout the protolarval and much of <br />the mesolarval phase, myomeres are chevron-shaped <br />but by the beginning of the metalarval phase they <br />evolve to their typical three-angled adult form. <br />Fish (1932) and many subsequent authors indicated <br />that there is a nearly direct, one-to-one correla- <br />tion between total myomeres and total vertebrae. <br />Snyder (1979), including or assuming inclusion of <br />the .Weberian ossicles in total vertebra counts, <br />provided considerable data on cypriniform fishes in <br />support of this generalization. <br /> <br />The most anterior and posterior myomeres are <br />frequently difficult to distinguish. The most <br />anterior myomeres are apparent only in the epiaxial <br />or dorsal half of the body; the first is often <br />deltoid in shape and is located immediately behind <br />the occiput. The most posterior myomere is defined <br />as lying anterior to the most posterior complete <br />myoseptum. Siefert (l969) describes a "false <br />(partial) myoseptum" posterior to the last complete <br />myoseptum which adds to the difficulty of discern- <br />ing the last myomere. Early in the larval period, <br />myomeres are most readily observed using transmitted <br />light. Polarizing filters, depending on the thick- <br />ness and certain other qualities of the preserved <br />tissues, can often be used to dramatically increase <br />the contrast between the muscle tissue of the myo- <br />meres and the myosepta that separate them. <br />Surface staining (i .e., dipping momentarily in <br />Alizarin Red, or perhaps another dye, then rinsing) <br />or submergence in glycerin might also be useful in <br />helping to distinguish individual myomeres. The <br />myomeres of some metalarvae and juveniles are often <br />difficult to observe; reflected light at a low <br />angle from one side and higher magnification some- <br />times facilitates observation. <br /> <br />Typical counts used in taxonomic work include <br />total, preanal, and postanal counts. Partial counts <br />are frequently used to reference the location of <br />various structures in addition to the vent. The <br />most generally accepted method of making partial <br />counts is that described by Siefert (1969) for <br />distinguishing preanal and postanal myomeres: <br /> <br />"postanal myomeres include all [entire] myomeres <br />posterior to an imaginary vertical line drawn through <br />the body at the posterior end of the anus . . , <br />Remaining myomeres, inclUding those bisected by the <br />line, are considered preanal." <br /> <br />The technique is equally applicable to other struc- <br />tures or points of reference such as the origins of <br />various fins or finfolds. Another approach used by <br />Snyder et al. (1977), Snyder and Douglas (1978), <br />Loos and Fuiman (1977) and, according to the latter <br />authors, Fish (1932) is essentially the opposite; <br />only entire myomeres are included in the count <br />anterior to the structure of reference. As counts <br />resulting from Siefert's methods are expected to <br />more nearly approximate the number of vertebrae to <br />the point of interest, that approach will be <br />accepted as the standard for this guide and future <br />Identification Circulars. <br /> <br />Snyder (1979) reported: "The range of total <br />vertebra and/or myomere counts for 70 cyprinid <br />species, 28 to 51, is larger and essentially <br />includes that for 27 catostomids, 32 to 52. Preanal <br />and postanal myomere counts ranged from 19 to 31 <br />and 10(9?} to 18, respectively, for cyprinids and <br />25 to 42 and 5(3?} to 12(14?) for catostomids. The <br />two families can be readily distinguished by the <br />proportion of postanal to preanal myomeres, about <br />1/2 or greater for cyprinids and 1/3 or less for <br />catostomids; or preanal to total myomeres, about <br />2/3 or less for cyprinids and 3/4 or more for <br />catostomids. The genera of each family are charac- <br />terized by distinctive ranges of total myomeres or <br />vertebrae Which can be used to help determine the <br />identity of unknown cypriniform larvae." <br /> <br />Fins and Finfolds: Fin ray meristics and fin <br />positions, usually determined from older juveniles <br />and adults or gleaned from published descriptions <br />of adults, are among the most useful characters <br />for later mesolarvae and metalarvae, especially <br />among the cyprinids. The sequence and timing <br />(relative to larval length) of fin development as <br />well as fin lengths and basal lengths of the dorsal <br />and anal fins are also useful. <br /> <br />The median finfold, one of the most obvious of <br />larval structures in protolarvae and early mesolarvae, <br />is a continuous structure originating on the dorsal <br />surface, usually well behind the head, and extending <br />posteriorly to and around the end of the notochord <br />then anteriorly along the ventral surface to the <br />posterior margin of the vent. During the mesolarval <br />phase, this finfold differentiates at the sites of <br />the future median fins then, as the fins develop, <br />it recedes or diminishes before and between the <br />fins until it is no longer apparent, usually at or <br />near the end of the metalarval phase. <br /> <br />The p!.eanal finfold. a second median finfold, <br />mayor may not be present upon hatching, depending <br />upon the size and shape of the yolk sac. In the <br />burbot (Lata 7.ota) and its marine relatives (Gadidae), <br />the preanal finfold is initially continuous with the <br />ventral portion of the median finfold, the vent <br />opening to one side of the finfold; they later <br />separate. In cypriniforms, the preanal finfold is <br />typically absent or barely apparent upon hatching. <br />As yolk is consumed and the yolk sac is reduced in <br />size, either during the late embryonic phase or the <br />protolarval phase, a small finfold appears just <br />anterior to the vent. As more yolk is consumed and <br />the larva grows, the preanal finfold enlarges and <br />extends anteriorly, usually well in advance of the <br />origin of the dorsal finfold. The preanal finfold <br />remains prominent throughout the mesolarval phase <br />and slowly diminiShes in a posterior direction <br />during the metalarval phase. It is typically the <br />last of the finfolds to completely disappear. <br />