|
<br />10 LARVAL CHARACTERIS1. ~
<br />
<br />at the genus or species levels. Specific identifica-
<br />tion relies largely on meristics such as myomere and
<br />fin ray counts, morphometrics such as snout to vent
<br />lengths, and melanistic (brown or black) pigment
<br />patterns. In addition, the size at which certain
<br />developmental events occur and the form of various
<br />structures can be useful. There is often a notice-
<br />able amount of intra- as well as inter-regional
<br />variability in many of the characters to be discussed.
<br />Awareness of this variability or its possible
<br />presence, and use of several diagnostic characters,
<br />if possible, will increase confidence in identifica-
<br />tion while reducing the probability of error.
<br />
<br />Myomeres: Myomeres, because they are obvious
<br />morphological features and relatively consistent in
<br />number and position, are one of the most useful
<br />characters available for identification of larvae
<br />above (and sometimes at) the specific level,
<br />especially for protolarvae and mesolarvae. They
<br />begin as part of the embryonic somites and are
<br />usually formed in their full complement prior to
<br />hatching. Throughout the protolarval and much of
<br />the mesolarval phase, myomeres are chevron-shaped
<br />but by the beginning of the metalarval phase they
<br />evolve to their typical three-angled adult form.
<br />Fish (1932) and many subsequent authors indicated
<br />that there is a nearly direct, one-to-one correla-
<br />tion between total myomeres and total vertebrae.
<br />Snyder (1979), including or assuming inclusion of
<br />the .Weberian ossicles in total vertebra counts,
<br />provided considerable data on cypriniform fishes in
<br />support of this generalization.
<br />
<br />The most anterior and posterior myomeres are
<br />frequently difficult to distinguish. The most
<br />anterior myomeres are apparent only in the epiaxial
<br />or dorsal half of the body; the first is often
<br />deltoid in shape and is located immediately behind
<br />the occiput. The most posterior myomere is defined
<br />as lying anterior to the most posterior complete
<br />myoseptum. Siefert (l969) describes a "false
<br />(partial) myoseptum" posterior to the last complete
<br />myoseptum which adds to the difficulty of discern-
<br />ing the last myomere. Early in the larval period,
<br />myomeres are most readily observed using transmitted
<br />light. Polarizing filters, depending on the thick-
<br />ness and certain other qualities of the preserved
<br />tissues, can often be used to dramatically increase
<br />the contrast between the muscle tissue of the myo-
<br />meres and the myosepta that separate them.
<br />Surface staining (i .e., dipping momentarily in
<br />Alizarin Red, or perhaps another dye, then rinsing)
<br />or submergence in glycerin might also be useful in
<br />helping to distinguish individual myomeres. The
<br />myomeres of some metalarvae and juveniles are often
<br />difficult to observe; reflected light at a low
<br />angle from one side and higher magnification some-
<br />times facilitates observation.
<br />
<br />Typical counts used in taxonomic work include
<br />total, preanal, and postanal counts. Partial counts
<br />are frequently used to reference the location of
<br />various structures in addition to the vent. The
<br />most generally accepted method of making partial
<br />counts is that described by Siefert (1969) for
<br />distinguishing preanal and postanal myomeres:
<br />
<br />"postanal myomeres include all [entire] myomeres
<br />posterior to an imaginary vertical line drawn through
<br />the body at the posterior end of the anus . . ,
<br />Remaining myomeres, inclUding those bisected by the
<br />line, are considered preanal."
<br />
<br />The technique is equally applicable to other struc-
<br />tures or points of reference such as the origins of
<br />various fins or finfolds. Another approach used by
<br />Snyder et al. (1977), Snyder and Douglas (1978),
<br />Loos and Fuiman (1977) and, according to the latter
<br />authors, Fish (1932) is essentially the opposite;
<br />only entire myomeres are included in the count
<br />anterior to the structure of reference. As counts
<br />resulting from Siefert's methods are expected to
<br />more nearly approximate the number of vertebrae to
<br />the point of interest, that approach will be
<br />accepted as the standard for this guide and future
<br />Identification Circulars.
<br />
<br />Snyder (1979) reported: "The range of total
<br />vertebra and/or myomere counts for 70 cyprinid
<br />species, 28 to 51, is larger and essentially
<br />includes that for 27 catostomids, 32 to 52. Preanal
<br />and postanal myomere counts ranged from 19 to 31
<br />and 10(9?} to 18, respectively, for cyprinids and
<br />25 to 42 and 5(3?} to 12(14?) for catostomids. The
<br />two families can be readily distinguished by the
<br />proportion of postanal to preanal myomeres, about
<br />1/2 or greater for cyprinids and 1/3 or less for
<br />catostomids; or preanal to total myomeres, about
<br />2/3 or less for cyprinids and 3/4 or more for
<br />catostomids. The genera of each family are charac-
<br />terized by distinctive ranges of total myomeres or
<br />vertebrae Which can be used to help determine the
<br />identity of unknown cypriniform larvae."
<br />
<br />Fins and Finfolds: Fin ray meristics and fin
<br />positions, usually determined from older juveniles
<br />and adults or gleaned from published descriptions
<br />of adults, are among the most useful characters
<br />for later mesolarvae and metalarvae, especially
<br />among the cyprinids. The sequence and timing
<br />(relative to larval length) of fin development as
<br />well as fin lengths and basal lengths of the dorsal
<br />and anal fins are also useful.
<br />
<br />The median finfold, one of the most obvious of
<br />larval structures in protolarvae and early mesolarvae,
<br />is a continuous structure originating on the dorsal
<br />surface, usually well behind the head, and extending
<br />posteriorly to and around the end of the notochord
<br />then anteriorly along the ventral surface to the
<br />posterior margin of the vent. During the mesolarval
<br />phase, this finfold differentiates at the sites of
<br />the future median fins then, as the fins develop,
<br />it recedes or diminishes before and between the
<br />fins until it is no longer apparent, usually at or
<br />near the end of the metalarval phase.
<br />
<br />The p!.eanal finfold. a second median finfold,
<br />mayor may not be present upon hatching, depending
<br />upon the size and shape of the yolk sac. In the
<br />burbot (Lata 7.ota) and its marine relatives (Gadidae),
<br />the preanal finfold is initially continuous with the
<br />ventral portion of the median finfold, the vent
<br />opening to one side of the finfold; they later
<br />separate. In cypriniforms, the preanal finfold is
<br />typically absent or barely apparent upon hatching.
<br />As yolk is consumed and the yolk sac is reduced in
<br />size, either during the late embryonic phase or the
<br />protolarval phase, a small finfold appears just
<br />anterior to the vent. As more yolk is consumed and
<br />the larva grows, the preanal finfold enlarges and
<br />extends anteriorly, usually well in advance of the
<br />origin of the dorsal finfold. The preanal finfold
<br />remains prominent throughout the mesolarval phase
<br />and slowly diminiShes in a posterior direction
<br />during the metalarval phase. It is typically the
<br />last of the finfolds to completely disappear.
<br />
|