My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7925
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:48:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7925
Author
Smith, G. L., ed.
Title
Proceedings, Workshop In Instream Flow Habitat Criteria And Modeling, December 1979.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
Info. Series No. 40,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />These criteria2 were prepared by life history stage for those streamflow <br /> <br />parameters directly influenced by changes in flow regime or channel geometry <br /> <br />and which were considered to most directly affect fish distribution; depth, <br /> <br />velocity, substrate and temperature. Species criteria for the Salmonid fishes <br /> <br />were developed and distributed by the Instream Flow Group in 1978 (Bovee <br /> <br />1978) , <br /> <br />The habitat suitability curves used in conjunction with the IFG metho- <br /> <br />dology are based on the understanding that individuals of a species tend to <br /> <br />select the most favorable conditions available within a stream for habitation, <br /> <br />bu~ will use less favorable conditions with less frequency eventually leaving <br /> <br />an area if possible before conditions become lethal. Subsequently individuals <br /> <br />would be most frequently observed (sampled) in nature inhabiting their most <br /> <br />preferred habitat conditions, Implicit in the use of these criteria is the <br /> <br />assumption that frequency of observation is, in fact, indicative of habitat <br /> <br />preference and the understanding that the data base used to construct the <br /> <br />curves was obtained in an unbiased manner. <br /> <br />Figure 3 presents example criteria for adult smallmouth bass, For a <br /> <br />given parameter value a weighting factor may be determined directly from the <br /> <br />curve. For example, a depth of 2,4 feet and a velocity of 0,6 ft./sec, yield <br /> <br />respective weighting factors of 0,37 and 0.80. The composite weighting factor <br /> <br />(C) for a cell with the depth of 3,5 feet and a velocity of 0.5 by adult small <br /> <br />mouth bass is (0.37 x 0.80) or 0.3. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Editors note: Prior to the workshop being reported on in this proceedings <br />these species criteria curves were referred to as probability-of-use curves, <br />However, it became apparent during the course of the workshop discussions <br />that these curves needed to be renamed. Several names have been considered <br />but the one chosen for use is "Habitat Parameter Suitability" curves. <br /> <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.