My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7925
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:48:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7925
Author
Smith, G. L., ed.
Title
Proceedings, Workshop In Instream Flow Habitat Criteria And Modeling, December 1979.
USFW Year
1979.
USFW - Doc Type
Info. Series No. 40,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />$ <br /> <br />are quite unrepresentative of the general riverine habitat type, With regard <br /> <br /> <br />to instream recreation potential, a critical reach might be chosen on the <br /> <br /> <br />basis of safety, access, or passage. The critical reach concept might also be <br /> <br /> <br />used to evaluate such other instream concerns as: navigation, waste assimila- <br /> <br /> <br />tion, or sediment transport. <br /> <br /> <br />The representative reach concept reflects recognition of the importance <br /> <br /> <br />of the structure and form of the entire stream in sustaining a particular <br /> <br /> <br />instream resource, Application of the representative reach concept is <br /> <br />appropriate when limited life history information is available on the target <br /> <br /> <br />species, or when limiting stream channel conditions (critical reaches) cannot <br /> <br /> <br />be identified with any degree of certainty, The representative reach concept <br /> <br /> <br />1S also the more appropriate approach for analysis of species interactions or <br /> <br /> <br />complimentary instream uses, <br /> <br /> <br />Two essentials of study site selection uS1ng the representative reach <br /> <br /> <br />approach are homogenei ty and randomness. lnit i ally, the stream must be <br /> <br /> <br />divided (stratified) into rather homogeneous segments based upon biological <br /> <br /> <br />community structure, stream channel morphology, stream flow regime, and humar: <br /> <br />activities, These stratified river segments are then sub-divided into popu;a- <br /> <br /> <br />tions of candidate representative reaches by either implicit or explicit <br /> <br /> <br />zonation techniques (Bovee and Milhous 1978), and three or four candidate <br /> <br /> <br />reaches are randomly selected from each of the respective populations of <br /> <br /> <br />candidate reaches, Following this office work using maps and aerial photos. <br /> <br /> <br />an on-site inspection is made of the candidate reaches to confirm that they <br /> <br /> <br />are generally representative of the river segment(s) being evaluated, The <br /> <br /> <br />actual study site(s) is then chosen from among the three or four candidate <br /> <br /> <br />reaches on the basis of access, manpower and financial resources, and the <br /> <br />limitations and safety of field personnel, What must be kept foremost in mind <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.