7925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ Council to vote a project up or down, but rather to insure that everyone is playing the game by the same rules. I think that the independent review function will also insure better planning procedures and more serious consideration of procedures such as you are developing here for purposes of estimating required minimum streamflows. There are a number of directives concerned with water conservation. I don't want to go into each of these individually, but merely give you some flavor of what these directives are all about. I believe that the decision by President Carter to make water conservation a cornerstone of Federal water policy is definitely a step forward as far as insuring adequate minimum streamflows for purposes of wildlife habitat and other uses. Because of the increasing future demands for water resulting from increasing economic and population growth, any successful efforts at reducing overall demand is bound to reduce the pressure on required minimum streamflows. For example, one of these directives requires all Federal agencies to review their existing programs by October 30 of this year and to report to the Water Resources Council ways that existing programs can be changed to promote water conser- vation. We are just now beginning to receive the first reports. Other areas involve things like cost sharing. The President has directed that legislation be drafted by the 'Water Resources Council to require 5 and 10 percent cost sharing by States for water resources projects. The purpose of this cost sharing is to insure more critical review of the need for water resources projects by States, thereby helping to insure that unnecessary water development projects will not be built. Other directives have also concerned cost sharing. For example, the Bureau of Reclamation received various directives to promote more adequate 13