My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7239
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7239
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/20/2009 2:46:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7239
Author
Smith, G. R. and R. G. Green.
Title
Flaming Gorge Consolidated Hydrology Report -Draft.
USFW Year
1990.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />This information along with technical data relating to outlet capacity, head, <br />and tailwater elevation was converted into a basic network and table format to <br />describe the physical characteristics of Flaming Gorge Reservoir. This <br />information along with the basic operational criteria as used to model the <br />operation of Flaming Gorge Reservoir. Operational simulation was accomplished <br />by building upon known operational characteristics and using a trial and error <br />methodology. <br /> <br />The model was calibrated through a series of trials where different reservoir <br />operations were modeled and the outcome of the trials evaluated. The trials <br />first began with short time periods of 1 to 3 years and were expanded as <br />results improved to cover the 1930 to 1982 period of record for the Green <br />River. Generally the model was operated for a period when Flaming Gorge was <br />in operation and the results were compared with actual reservoir operations on <br />a month by month basis. When the reservoir operated properly and the results <br />appeared reasonable the runs were were circulated for reviewed. Through this <br />process the operation of the model was refined and validation of model results <br />was achieved. The results of this process confirmed our conclusion that the <br />simulation of Flaming Gorge was as good as possible without some type of <br />expert system built into the model. <br /> <br />The next step is to use the model to run operational scenarios for the <br />Opinion. One particular scenario which may be addressed is the interim flow <br />agreement which has constrain releases from Flaming Gorge in the months of <br />August and September during 1986 and 1987 to improve habitat conditions for <br />Colorado Squawfish fry. Releases were be constrained to a maximum of 100,000 <br />acre-feet per month and would vary between 800 and 2,600 cfs on a daily basis. <br />The way HYDROSS is now set up and calibrated it can be used to model this <br />scenario and other scenarios with only minor modifications. <br /> <br />4.7 Conclusion <br /> <br />The HYDROSS model was setup and calibrated on the Green and Colorado Rivers <br />and can be used to model any monthly Flaming Gorge release scenario developed <br />for the Opinion. The model is capable of modeling changing scenarios, keeping <br />track of many levels of development, and analyzing changes between these <br />scenarios. The model has limitations in actively operating reservoirs, and <br />much of the initial setup is trial and error until the characteristics of the <br />reservoir and inflow are quantified. <br /> <br />The uses of the model to track depletions and establish an environmental <br />baseline have been established on the Colorado and Yampa Rivers where the <br />model is routinely used for Section 7 consultations. The model can also be <br />used for quantifying the test releases from flaming Gorge and identifying <br />impact when releases are shifted from the summer to the fall and winter. <br /> <br />4-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.