Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of. . <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is to present hydrologic information on Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir and to provide a technical basis for a Biological Opinion <br />(Opinion) on the operation of the project. The development of the hydrology <br />and biology studies for the Opinion was a joint effort by the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (Service) and the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation). The <br />studies were developed to provide technical information on the hydrology of <br />the Green River system and to analyze the effects of the past and current <br />operations of Flaming Gorge Reservoir. <br /> <br />The Study effort for the Opinion began in 1985 when a plan was devised to <br />secure information necessary to render an Opinion on Flaming Gorge. The plan <br />called for two parallel paths with hydrology and biology studies proceeding <br />independently during the initial stage and then being integrated into a <br />consolidated report which would become the biological assessment for the <br />Opinion. Under this concept study plans were developed and work on the <br />hydrology studies presented in this report and 12 biology studies which began <br />in FY 1986. <br /> <br />This arrangement was formalized as the Flaming Gorge Biological Opinion Team <br />(Team) and began effective operation in 1987. The Team prepared a integrated <br />study concept which was presented to the Management Group of the Recovery <br />Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. The study plan was reviewed by the Management Group in September <br />1988. Subsequently the plan was revised by the Team and additional <br />responsibilities were assigned principal investigators and team members <br />commensurate with the development of documents needed for the biological <br />opinion. The completion dates for some of the reports were also extended so <br />that additional data could be analyzed relevant to the low flow conditions <br />which existed in 1988. <br /> <br />The hydrology studies presented in this report have been carried out over the <br />past 3 years by a number of researchers working in many areas. This report <br />consolidates results of the hydrology studies, and describe the tools which <br />have been developed for analysis of alternative operations which might be <br />proposed by biologists and decision makers. Because the report presents <br />hydrology tool the discussion of conclusions is limited. <br /> <br />1.1 Study Responsibility <br /> <br />Each study covered in this report was assigned to a principal investigator who <br />carried out the work with the aid of staff as needed. The principal <br />investigator for each of the studies covered in this report was responsible <br />for the content of each study and assuring that each study was completed on <br />schedule and that all comments were addressed. Each study has undergone a <br />peer review and comments have been addressed as appropriate. Further comments <br />should be addressed to the principal investigator with copies to the Service's <br />Division of Water Resources. Principal investigators for each of the <br />individual studies are listed below. <br /> <br />1-1 <br />