Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />estimates based on other techniques (Shaul and Clark, in <br />press; Johnson, in press). <br />For GSI to provide reliable information for the wide range <br />of mixed-stock fisheries of Pacific salmonids, baseline data <br />must be available for a large number of potential source <br />populations covering a broad geographic area. Such data <br />have been gathered over the last decade, and currently the <br />body of genetic data on Pacific salmonids probably exceeds <br />that for any other organisms except Drosophila and man. In <br />the past several years a number of agencies (National Marine <br />Fisheries Service, Washington State Department of Fish- <br />eries, Fish and Wildlife Service, University of California at <br />Davis, Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans) have <br />used GSI to analyze mixed-stock fisheries for chinook, chum <br />(0. keta), pink (0. gorbllscha), and sockeye (0. nerka) salmon <br />(reviewed by Shaklee and Phelps, in press). Figure 1 illus- <br />rates how results obtained by GSl can be used to describe <br />seasonal changes in the stock composition of a fishery. For <br />sockeye salmon, use of a combination of genetic and non- <br />genetic markers (freshwater age, scale patterns, parasites) <br />has proved to be the most powerful means of analyzing <br />mixed-stock fisheries (Wood et al. 1989), and the same may <br />prove to be true for coho salmon (0. kislltch) as well. <br />GSI analyses have led to a more precise and comprehen- <br />sive picture of stock structuring than can be provided by <br />conventional tagging techniques. Nevertheless, the full <br />potential of GSI as a management tool has only begun to <br />be realized-perhaps a reflection of the time lag that typically <br />separates a technological development and its practical <br />implementation. The proven power of the approach, in <br />combination with the accumulation of successful manage- <br />ment applications, projects an increased role for GSI in the <br />near future. <br /> <br />Fraser River Basin <br />Test Fishery <br />1987 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />Percent 40 <br />Contribution <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Hatchery Monitoring and Evaluation <br /> <br />In the hatcher~ environment, the rate of genetic change <br />in a stock can be greatly increased as a result of inbreeding <br />or artificial selection (intentional or unintentional). Some <br />degree of adaptation to rearing conditions may be desirable, <br />particularly for salmon reared in net pens or as a permanently <br />cultured stock ip mitigation hatcheries. Rapid genetic <br />changes due to cmance, however, cannot be expected to be <br />beneficial. We agtee with Allendorf and Ryman (1987) that <br />the goal of hatch~ries designed to provide fish for release <br />into the wild should be to preserve as nearly as possible <br />the genetic makeup of the ancestral stock. <br />The rate of random genetic change depends on the <br />parameter effectite population size (N,.). There are a variety <br />of opinions regarding the minimum acceptable value of N,. <br />(see Simberloff 1~88); almost certainly, there is no single <br />number that would apply to all species. Most geneticists, <br />however, would probably agree that an N,. of a few hundred <br />per generation isl necessary to avoid long-term deleterious <br />effects from inbreeding and genetic drift. Waples (in pressl) <br />showed that in P~cific salmon, N, per generation is equiva- <br />lent to the effective number of breeders per year (N,) times <br />the average age! at reproduction (= generation length). <br />Although many h~tcheries regularly spawn several hundred <br />or more adults ea~h year, skewed sex ratios in the spawners, <br />unequal fertilization rates of different individuals in mass <br />spawnings, and, high v.ariance in survival rates among <br />families all may cause N,. to be smaller than the number <br />that actually spawn. In the last decade, fisheries managers <br />have been increasingly aware of practices that can result in <br />genetic changes, and guidelines have been proposed to <br />minimize them (el g., Meffe 1986; Simon et al. 1986; Allendorf <br /> <br />Upper Fraser <br /> <br />Fraser <br /> <br />River <br /> <br />Fraser <br /> <br />May June July-Aug Sept-Oct <br /> <br />Figure 1. GSI estimates of contributions of chinook salmon stocks to a 1987 test fishery ~ear the mouth of the Fraser River (Canada). <br />Dramatic changes in the stock composition of the fishery over a period of several months ~re apparent. This type of information can be <br />used to adjust fishing pressure to target abundant stocks and protect less abundant ones. I Genetic data were compiled by the National <br />Marine Fisheries Service using procedures described by Aebersold et at. (1987); the baselihe and fishery samples were provided by the <br />Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Washington Department of Fisheries, <br /> <br />September - October 1990 <br /> <br />21 <br />