Laserfiche WebLink
<br />132 Swimming Against the Current <br /> <br />ion in May 1990 concluding that the project <br />was likely to jeopardize the continued exis- <br />tence of the species. Furthermore, the USFWS <br />concluded that no reasonable or prudent al- <br />ternatives were available to avoid jeopardy <br />and recommended additional study to develop <br />a more complete data base, especially on <br />stream-flow needs for the fish in the San juan <br />River. <br />The USFWS opinion placed the project on <br />hold and evoked a major outcry from Colo- <br />rado and New Mexico congressional delega- <br />tions, the governor of Colorado, a variety of <br />state and local officials, Indian tribes, and <br />other project supporters. Even Secretary of <br />the Interior Manuel Lujan suggested that the <br />ESA was too restrictive and recommended that <br />Congress amend it to allow consideration of <br />economic factors in the section 7 consultation <br />process. <br />As a result of the draft biological opinion, <br />th~ Animas-La Plata project was reexamined. <br />A revised draft opinion was issued by the ser- <br />vice in May 1991 that would approve devel- <br />opment of a scaled-down version of the proj- <br />ect subject to several condit:ons, including: <br /> <br />I. Operation of Navajo Reservoir to provide <br />releases that mimic a natural hydrograph <br />in the San Juan River; <br />2. Conducting a seven year research program <br />to better assess the habitat requirements of <br />the endangered fishes in the Sanjuan River; <br />3. Implementing a long term recovery pro- <br />gram for the endangered fishes in the San <br />juan River basin. <br /> <br />Whether this opinion will ultimately be ac- <br />cepted and the Animas-La Plata project con- <br />structed remains to be determined. However, <br />it now appears that the San juan River will <br />become a major focal point for recovery ef- <br />forts in the next decade. <br /> <br />Coordination and Cooperation between <br />Agencies <br /> <br />Colorado River Fishes Recovery Team <br />(CRFRT) <br /> <br />The ESA directs the secretary of the interior to <br />develop and implement recovery plans for <br />threatened and endangered species with the <br />aid of appropriate public and private agen- <br />cies, institutions, and qualified individuals. By <br />this authority the USFWS invited various agen- <br />cies interested in management of th-i Colo- <br />rado River fishes to participate on the CRFRT. <br />Formed in December 1975 as the Colorado <br />Squawfish Recovery Team, the effort was ex- <br />panded in 1976 to include all endangered Col- <br />orado River fishes in the upper basin (K. D. <br />Miller 1982). The recovery team included rep- <br />resentatives from the states of Arizona, Cali- <br />fornia, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and <br />Utah, and from the USBR, USNPS, and USFWS. <br />Team members have written recovery plans <br />for bony tail, humpback chub, and Colorado <br />squawfish. The humpback chub and bony tail <br />plans were revised and approved in 1990. The <br />Colorado squaw fish plan is expected to be ap- <br />proved in 1991. <br /> <br />Colorado River Endangered Fishes <br />Researchers Meetings <br /> <br />Since 1983, fishery biologists and other re- <br />searchers from state and federal agencies, uni- <br />versities, and private consulting firms in the <br />upper basin have held an annual meeting <br />sponsored by the states of Colorado and Utah. <br />The open communication and coordination <br />provided by this meeting have been effective <br />at integrating research efforts among biolo- <br />gists. Communication among biologists from <br />the upper and lower basins has been enhanced <br />as well through annual meetings of the Desert <br />Fishes Council and through meetings of the <br />CRFRT. <br />